That’s interesting, a concise definition for sure. We clearly disagree on a few things. It seems like you desire a socialist government that allows somewhat restricted gun ownership, does that sound right?
As for guns, no one needs an SKS…at least not now. Conversely though no one needs a Prada purse, a Gucci watch, or plasma TV either, but we don’t outlaw those. That is why I support full freedom in this area.
I can see why people support universal health care. My knowledge of economics thus far has shown me that such a system will cause an increase in the cost and a decrease in the level of care. This situation will give rise to a private system that provides better care. Thus, the end result is that people who can’t pay are able to have care, but of a poor quality, much like now. And the wealthy will pay for the premium care they want…just as they do now.
The only real difference is for the working/middle class. They will be forced to pay for the government care plan through taxation, but may not be able to afford the higher private care. Thus they’ll be bearing the financial burden (unlike the poor), yet receiving the same care. Those in the middle class that choose to pay for the private health coverage will be forced to pay twice.
I wouldn’t stick to that economic theory so strongly, but it seems to be true in Canada right now.