Well those people aren’t paid to watch for suspicious people either…If I go to a public event and see cops or people who look like they are there for something other than to enjoy the event, I assume they are there to protect innocent people. I know that my tax dollars are going to good use for this person being paid to be there to protect me.
So… charge him in criminal court as a citizen or slap the enemy combatant label on him and ship it him off to some CIA black site for enhanced interrogation?
As much as I’d like to see this piece of shit waterboarded for months on end he’s a naturalized citizen and should get all the protections under our laws that citizenship demands.
EDIT: Let the Feds seek the death penalty too, just like they did with Tim McVeigh.
This whole thing is very simple…
Ban cookware. Ban nails. Ban beebees. Ban backpacks unless clear so that contents can be viewed by anyone at anytime. Take the windows and doors out of your homes so the police can come inane search easier. Cancel all international incoming travelers. Ban the wearing of hats in public. Stay indoors 100% of the time so only criminals and police are in the streets. Ban marathons and just to be safe any other large gathering of people in a public place.
Once they ban cash they will know every little fucking thing you do/buy. Problem solved… right?
He’s right, but for the wrong reasons. He puts too much emphasis on skin color and country of origin while ignoring scale of association, motivation and historical context. He tries to draw parallels where there are clear differences.
There always have been and always will be anti-government people willing to go to extremes to make a political point. But there are statistically few people out there like this, despite what MSNBC implies. If a while guy is mad at the IRS and crashes a plane in to the IRS building (as happened a while back) it’s branded an isolated incident because it is an isolated incident. Even if you demographically group him into “white, IRS hating people” there is no mandate for those in that group to act in such a fashion regardless if they’re all “white dudes.”
On the other hand, those who believe in extremest Muslim ideology do have a mandate. They literally believe they can bring about the end of days by attacks like this and those that cannot be turned to Islam should be killed. And they’ve believed this long before we consumed oil, occupied land or had drones. Long before the US even existed. Demographically and statistically this group is many times larger than any malcontent group in the US, has believed in this ideology since before Columbus crossed the Atlantic, and believes that they MUST act in this way as opposed to other means. So therefore we target them demographically and systematically.
It’s a logical approach, not an emotional one. Does it help our image around the world? Nope, but that’s not the objective.
Just to be clear of the motives, Muslims attack us because of our whole hearted support of Israel, nothing more, nothing less.
Or the fact we blow up countries where that is the primary religion :lol:
Let’s also be clear:
Islam is not a peaceful religion.
yes but the reason we blow up their countries is in the name of Israels interests.
The Palenstinian people are enduring some of the most grevious human rights violations in modern times right now.
Not condoning the actions of these two but it aggravates me when the media acts like “why?”.
Jimmy Carter on Palenstine-
Reasons like these tend to foster hatred, just saying
in regards to september 11th
Youtube making everyone an expert on global politics
If you honestly think extremist Muslims would simply leave us alone if it weren’t for our support of Israel you might want to pick up a history book. Start with the last 1400 years of Islamic Imperialism when Muhammad started raiding Meccan caravans.
If it’s not Israel, or drones it will be something else the extremists use to recruit new followers.
If you go back a bit catholics were mass murdering people and all kinds of fun things also 
People really forget history
Yep, get ready. There is really no need for forensic accounting if all currency is digital.
If only the oil producing nations weren’t Muslim. If only they would stop challenging our petrodollar arrangement and kindly allow us to leverage their oil.
Looks like he is being charged with
Use of a Weapon of Mass Destruction
Malicious Destruction of Property Resulting in Death.
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/tsarnaev_criminal_complaint_130421_1847.pdf
Dan
If you read the narrative in the criminal complaint it is the same as the news was reporting.
Of course it is, they’re all in on it, just like 9/11. :tinfoil:
lol it’s all part of the so called nwa coming together so they can bring in there new laws and we will say yes please we want them. right back to the Hitler days
Nope. In part, certainly NOT in whole. Just one historical example:
In March 1785, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli’s envoy, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). Upon inquiring “concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury”, the ambassador replied:
"It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once."
This had nothing to do with Israel back in 1700-1800 when they were attacking our ships unprovoked.
Christians did some of the same stuff for a while, but at least they’ve mellowed out. Honestly, these things are not taught as much as they should.