:number1
If the first and second bold part add up to the last bold part… then that court, its occupants and the decision is NO DIFFERENT that what we as outsiders are doing right now. Only minor difference is its written in stone “innocent until proven guilty”, so when they all throw their hand up in the air and shrug their shoulders, the bitch walks.
now for the rebuttal to the red:
thats a load of shit… unless the judge and EVERY jury member says “fuckkkk no this is 100% the wrong person” mother fucker is guilty. Too fucking bad if they are the slim chance and arnt really the person who did it. Statistically, mathematically and ethically more people on the stand are guilty of what they are accused of than not… yet our constitution says the opposite. All goes back to what I have been saying blend in with the sheep and your chances of being put on trial are almost ZERO (unless you are set up, or just have shit piss luck and kinda look like it could be you).
furthermore, WTF is the judges job anyways? Try to remember some rules of a court and read a piece of paper at the end? REMOVE THE JURY. Pay the judge more, protect him from society more, what ever. Make them the single choice. If they take their job seriously, and that person is a just person, but the defendants balls in his hand and man up. Way to many IMMORAL loopholes letting over payed, scumbag lawyers allow law breakers to skate through. infact I bet if you couldnt afford a “good” lawyer, got setup for a crime you didnt commit, and the prosecuting attorney had a lot of pull and was a snake, you would be FUCKED. But thats too bad so sad… you are an unfortunate mistake lost at sea with all the other guilty people that may have walked at some point and killed your family… you never know.