He’s making fun of your shit grammar, not your legalese.
I love law students - they think they know what they’re talking about but its blatantly obvious they have no clue what they’re talking about.
I know this because I was once a law student who thought he knew what he was talking about.
If you guys want to talk grammar then start a thread about it. Otherwise stay on topic or I’ll move the posts and start one for you.
Then I’m not really concerned, I know I have shit grammar, but it’s the internet, I don’t go back and proof read then wait a few hours so I can go back again and edit. And if it’s blatantly obvious I don’t know what I’m talking about besides grammar then please explain, as I actually have no issue with being told I’m wrong if there is actual feedback. But I figured since this is a concept you learn in the first few weeks of class and I did very well in the class I could try to shed some light on it. And I drew the conclusion based on the fact that I said I hoped it was understandable.
My guess is she came in for an inspection or some minor repairs and was told her vehcile was unsafe to drive. They then produced a $4k+ repair bill she couldn’t afford but offered to get her in something safer for $300 a month. Probably threw her in an 84 month term, at 8%, then slapped on a VSC and GAP for over $5k. All while holding her keys since she hadn’t paid for the repairs or inspection on her altima.
Did anything illegal happen, who knows unless it was recorded. But put a single mother with 3 crying kids in front of a Judge during re-election on a story making national headlines and you never know how it could go.
butt spell checks is builts into the browser.
Well . . . it is blatantly obvious that you don’t know what you’re talking about.
The court won’t look at the case and throw it out until someone files a request for judicial intervention. At this point her lawyer, who probably also has piss poor grammar, is going to try to shake down the dealership before even bringing it to a judge’s attention.
In a false imprisonment case she has to be under the perception that she can’t leave. You won’t know that until you get a deposition from her (again, before any judicial intervention).
Summary Judgment is only granted when there is no dispute of facts. Here, there is definitely a factual dispute.
Doing well in a class in law school does not translate to success in the legal world. Large testicles are what translates to success in the practice of law. That, and knowing someone who can get you a job out of school.
I was trying to keep the post some what short and not go into everything that happens. I also pointed out that I was going by the facts only put out in the article which are limited.
This is almost a lawyerly answer. Instead of back pedaling you should learn the art of deflection.
I saw a picture of you deflecting a car off a wall at the Glen 
Did you saaaaaay…yoots?
Actually the car went directly IN to the wall - no deflection. So, we have a dispute of facts here. Summary judgment is not appropriate in this case.
damn, case dismissed…
not even a $50 fee and time served
Why would anyone complain about being sold GAP coverage? 
Classic case of person driving $700 car having buyer’s remorse after their co-worker who also drives an equally junk car, says they could have done better.
Probably a last day of the month deal. I know when I sold cars (which was a shitty dealership, but oh well) that if we couldn’t close a deal within a couple minutes of closing, we’d have to set an appt. with the customer for the next day. Unless it was the 29th-31st of the month. Then they’d stay open til the last customer left. Gotta get them bonuses.
Sounds like the old Saratoga Nissan. People need to be aware that dealerships can be sleazy but you also have to have the balls to say the deal sucks and walk out.
Another Nissan dealership issue, this time downstate NY: http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/7_on_your_side&id=9443400 (with video)
Rahman thought he made a sweet deal on a new Pathfinder. The sticker price was $31,000 but he got a deal handwritten on the purchase agreement: less than $28,000.
But after he got home, he found another purchase agreement with a pumped up price, nearly $10,000 higher.
The stuff that happens in or around Long Island/NYC is ridiculous. I’m confident every consumer protection law that gets enacted is because of something that happened on the island.
I wish I was a judge, I hate shit lawsuits.