eh. they are just too shiny for my tastes. The look like caddy wheels. I didn’t get blue, BTW.
No they dont. They look hot.
I think the wheels are sexy.
Yeah it looks good but after a day of driving a nice coat of dust on black cars suck. I havent washed my car in over a year but I do have to carefully wipe dust off of it even if I havent driven it and then detail it again to get all of the swirl marks out.
X2^
+1
Sometimes it’s difficult to do since our angle to the sun is always changing, but a similar shot or as similar as possible would be nice (especially if his before picture makes the car look horrid).
Wow, that is immaculate. And I really like those wheels, whether they are on an Evo or Vette, they look amazing to me.
How 'bout before and after pics in a garage with flourescent lights…if a car looks good under these lights it’ll look absolutely amazing in the daylight. Plus, one can get an accurate before and after. I did ALL my work (when I was detailing during the college years) under flourescents and they’ll tell the truth every time as to how good the paint is/isn’t.
How about both fluorescent AND a high powered halogen? 
Fluorescent lighting will show scratches, sun/halogen will show swirl intensity. 
Either/or…but flourescents will also show swirls as well as everything one would need to see when detailing. Like I said, if you can’t see any imperfections under flourescents you’ll never see them in the “real world”. My biggest pet peeve is headlights on cars and how often those pic out “errors” in paint work…most notably mismatches in paint color.
Any werd an duh wheelz size/speks?
I suppose the sun doesn’t count as the “real world.”
I see you like to debate with me…if you’d, insert “sun” into where I wrote “real world”…this is what it will look like: “Like I said, if you can’t see any imperfections under flourescents you’ll never see them in the sun.” I still stand by the point of my original statement…flourescents show more imperfections than the sun ever will.
that ka looks balllaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa