That is a complicated answer in my eyes. I have tuned ltx vehicles but have stopped tuning the ltx computer.http://www.eficonnection.com/24x/default.htm
I was on the list to goto that school since Adam at popsracing got me in as a favor. Had a business trip planned already so I have to wait for the next one. I have talked to Greg banish a few times before and he is a very smart man. Just wanted to take the class to confirm my practices especially with the late model virtual VE tables and the scaling when hitting injector flow limits or creating more room in the maf and load tables on high HP or forced inducted applications
A ton of LS platforms just recently more TBSS’s than anything else since they are the popular thing.
Very intelligent post and yes that holds 99% true. the priciples are the same just implementing changes from platform to platform
I agree as well. I.E. the tbss loads the motor harder than a vette so it takes less timing to get to MBT
Yes your car was a classic case of “dyno tune” otherwise known as PE raping. only major changes were injector flow rate, idle timing and WOT commanded fueling. The maf and ve were BONE STOCK!!! and it was commanding around 9.7:1 to get your 12.5ish afr at wot. I know these are details you and I talked about but details I wanted everyone to know.
Also, I have been lacking on posting results since I know guys will want pictures of the car or sometimes timeslips. I have no problem posting combo’s and results but in the respect that some of my guys still grudge race around here pics will not be posted.
F-body
F-body
The funny thing is, I did the Injector scaling myself AND the idle timing. When I got my car after the dyno tune, it didnt really run how I wanted it too…so I started tuning it myself and got it tweaked enough to make it run some what decent…