FAST motorsports in Albany, NY (Attn: All LS vehicles)

[SSmokinn_SS]

@262

Out of those shops you listed and even GM, explain this concept to me. If remapping the entire tune is the proper way to tune and is the only way it should be done then

WHY do some still PE rape their tunes?

especially GM if they tuned correctly then we would have no business with bone stock cars for the most part. Dont get me wrong that they need to take into account neglict but still I point out PE raping tuning technique.

I have seen wayyyy to many tunes come from big name shops that have BONE STOCK ve and maf tables, inccorect injector data and PE tables that look like the rocky mountains. Just like ssmokinnss’s car. It was 85% stock programming.

Running the car on a load dyno to hit every cell in order will be nice but smooth transistions from cell to cell by driving on the street will acomplish the same thing and in this case faster since you will be working on a range of the map all at once.

Im not saying a dyno should never be used but I am saying it should never be said it will make or break your tune. I have more cars tuned that have never seen a dyno that based on their combo’s well out perform the “normal” that similar cars see at the track. So all this focus on a dyno is nice and all but i will ask this

What is more important to a drag racer? RWHP or ET?

this is exactly what I was getting at…