Financial experts say recession ends by year's end

A group of financial wizards looked into their crystal ball Tuesday and saw some good news.

The recession will ease by the end of this year and companies will begin adding workers, signaling the end of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.
It was the 64th day of the Obama administration and Chicago-based Dow Jones Indexes assembled a group of financial experts to assess the impact of government actions, whether they will work to stem the recession and what opportunities that might present investors.

The recession has affected every region of the country and nearly every sector of the economy, said Gus Faucher, director of macroeconomics at Moody’s Economy.com, which conducts independent research and provides economic forecasts.

“It’s really unprecedented in the U.S. to have nearly the entire country in a recession simultaneously,” he said.

The good news is there’s an end in sight.

The economy will pull out of the recession at the end of this year, marking a duration of 24 months, about twice as long as the average post-World War II recession, Faucher said.

The unemployment rate is expected to peak at nearly 10 percent in the first half of 2010. Without the $787 billion government stimulus package, he estimated job losses would have continued into the second half of the year and peaked at about 12 percent.

“That would take what is now a severe recession and actually turn it into a deep depression,” he said. “We think the fiscal stimulus package is vital in turning around attitudes toward the economy.”

He said we are at or near a stock market bottom and stock prices should soon stabilize.

That certainly wasn’t the case so far this week. The Dow Jones industrial average gained 498 points on Monday but dropped 115 points, or 1.5 percent, on Tuesday.

Home sales will turn around by midyear and home prices will begin recovering by the end of this year after bottoming out at 35 percent of their value from peak to trough. Home prices won’t return to their values of a few years ago during the boom, but will recover from current lows, he said.

Banks will likely begin seeing improvement in capital as the government program to remove bad assets kicks in and the Federal Reserve provides more economic support. Faucher predicted major bank and financial services company failures will abate in the second half of this year and credit will begin to move again.

Those improvements and additional government spending will provide investors some opportunities in companies that own bridges, toll roads and utilities. It also will drive growth in areas of green energy production.

The stimulus package will spend $50 billion on roads, bridges, utilities and other infrastructure, said Craig Noble, portfolio manager, for Brookfield Redding LLC, a Chicago-based investment manager of global real estate and infrastructure securities.

He sees a potential sweet spot for investors in companies that own the assets that will benefit from the needed spending. He said the stimulus package is only a small portion of government spending on transportation and utilities. Congress must reauthorize this year a multiyear transportation bill that provides hundreds of billions of dollars in spending and sets priorities for the next five years or more.

“The infrastructure class currently offers a unique and compelling investment case with trillions needed to be spend across the globe in coming years,” he said.

Stimulus packages rolled out in Canada, Europe, Australia, South America and China show the global nature of the infrastructure asset class, he said.

Obama administration polices that emphasize renewable energy such as wind power will also push billions of dollars into building electricity-carrying power lines and the towers to hold them. That construction is needed to carry wind power from expanding wind turbine farms in the Midwest to population centers in the Eastern United States.

Personal Finance Writer David Pitt reported from Des Moines, Iowa.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Financial-experts-say-apf-14734171.html
:cjerk:

Lies, the international financial new world order illuminati stand to gain far too much to let us recover, they’re going to drive this all into the ground, then ???, followed by profit

easier said then done

i made it easier to read lol, sorry

I dont care what anyone says.

If they can predict and end then they more or less could have solved the problem.

Sept. 2008 - “The fundamentals of our economy are strong”. I apologize if I don’t exactly place all my trust in nameless financial “experts”.

I see this as merely a political move, jawboning the market after a brief positive move. Every little bit helps, I guess. I’m just not ready to call it sunshine and rainbows from here on out.

:lol: That came from a financial goon, not a financial expert.

Calling a bottom at the end of 09 is optimistic, but not unreasonable.

That’s not logical. You can have a reasonable ability to predict something when you know what you’re looking for, but just because someone can predict something, that doesn’t mean they can affect it; and just because someone missed one thing that they had no real reason to be looking for, it doesn’t mean that they will be wrong when they see something they are looking for.

End of the recession doesn’t mean the end of crappy economic times, it just means it has bottomed and going back up.

Doesn’t seem that unfathomable to me.

We don’t really know where that idea came from, besides the amorphous field of financial “experts”. I’m not saying a recovery can’t be in-the-works by the end of '09, I’m just not convinced yet. Lately, I’m just feeling a bit more disappointed than usual in the theory of imperfect knowledge. I feel there is a lot of purposeful misinformation out there right now.

So much of the battle is just convincing people that it’s getting better. Things could be terrible, but if all the sudden “experts” and Obama start saying that it’s working, consumer confidence will jump among those who have no idea what’s really going on.

I do think we’re making progress, and I’d agree that by the end of 09 seems a little too good to be true, but certainly possible. Bernanke hinted at the same idea about a week ago

Ok let me rephrase that…

If there was a foreseeable end, then there would have to be a foreseeable solution.

If this was the case, this shitty situation would have been solved months ago. I realize the time it takes to fix matters of this sort and it usually does take the participation of many different parties. But in a nutshell, thats why im not listening to any “predictions,” because its just way to sensitive of a matter to lave to one theory. There are too many variables.

To me this proposal was derived in the same way as if I stepped outside, saw a few clouds and said, “its probably gonna rain within the day.”

exactly

Yeah.

Probably, but that could backfire. Irrational exuberance can be just as bad as irrational fear, as we learned when we got into this mess in the first place.

that’s all fine and dandy, but a few months ago bush was just leaving/obama was just becoming president

its not like the bush admin was going to throw together a plan when they were all on the way out; which would then be completely thrown out, let alone nothing would pass in congress to make any progressive movement

Great point!

:tup:

Again, I disagree. When Hurricane Katrina hit, they knew roughly when it would be over, but had no way to fix it. The economy is immensely complicated, and not fully within our control (nor should it be, you commie :lol: ). You can make predictions without having a solution, and trends which appear to be givens on the large scale over time might be difficult to affect in the short term. Additionally, economists will disagree over the correct course to take.

The economy is really easily and appropriately comparable to weather.

We can argue this all day and obviously there will always be trends and historical examples as reference to “experts of these articles.”

All im gonna say is, news like this alone, is good for the economy, but I am still not believing anything until I see it.

If you’re so confident in this article, hypothetically you could be a rich man by years end couldn’t you? Prove me wrong with your portfolio 3 quarters from now and then we’ll talk.

Sept. 2008 -
[FONT=Verdana]“Stubborn.”
“Out of touch.”
“Incapable of understanding the economic crisis” - Obama

[/FONT]
March 15, 2009 - “If we are keeping focused on all the fundamentally sound aspects of our economy, then we’re going to get through this” - Obama

:bloated:

I’m not in a position to be investing large amounts of money right now. The money I’m spending on law school will serve me much better than anything I could invest in the market right now.

There’s a difference between saying, “the fundamentals of the economy are strong,” (they weren’t) and saying, “we need to focus on the fundamentally strong aspects of our economy,” (we do).

In fact, they’re completely different. The first requires every significant part of the economy to be strong, the latter only requires some to be strong, and indicates that we should work at those.