I JUST DONT GET WHY EVERYONE THINKS THE Z IS SO FAST.IT RUNS 13.6 -14.1S AND THE S2000 RUNS 13.9-14.2S THE S2K IS ON PAR WITH THE Z.ITS WAY BETTER LOOKING AND HANDLE BETTER IS THERE A CONTEST :banana
your wrong and this thread is a fail
crossfire >>> all
YOUR CAR FAILS :crackup
and so does your life
bobby, i’m not sure if you can read writing that is normal size. so i’ll see if you catch this one.
TURN OFF CAPS LOCK, PLEASE.
Well, not everyone measures a car by it’s quarter mile Mr. Toretto.
honda > *
… now please don’t make anymore threads, you suck
I prefer the S2k looks Wise.
However the z is a 4 seater is it not?
where as the s2k is only a 2 seater. making the Z more practical.
Plus the z has more trim lines.
Coupe, touring, and convertable.
s2k’s are all convertable. and the Hard top to put on the s2k is quite pricy.
why in the world would you buy a Z over a G35c?
you were running high 14’s at lebanon???
What I don’t really get is why you’re so curious about peoples input about your car, why you posted two threads that are basically the same thing, and of course why you always TYPE IN CAPS.
bobbyt…what year and color is your car? Are you on the regional forums on s2ki?
Z is a 2 seater man
and almost all Z’s have been since being introduced
I ran a 14.7 at lebanon with out a launch on balled tires, not bad if you ask me.I hear that this track is slow and it was my first time at the track.I going back latter this month with new tires and launching it.I hope to run low 14’s.
Why 350 over S2k or G35?
Personal preferance.lol
the 350z is nice looking, but imho, it doesn’t do the Z name justice. All Z’s have always been sleek and streamlined. The 350z resembles a jellybean.
ohh i didnt know that
excuses.