holy rice ^^
wow. that makes me feel way better about my car.
that is an amazing piece of machinery…i mean piece of shit :lol
what a shame I actually like those wheels
^ i do too. Even though its ricey as hell, it seems like he did put a good amount of time and work into it.
wtf was it to begin with anyways?
apollo 13.
:rofl
You know your gay when…
honda fanbois… how dare you try and justify that madness???
“well I appreciate the work put into it… balh blah blah”
… are you fucking kidding me? :haha
:lol
This thread delivers.
…but no one said that. So it seems as if you’re kidding yourself. If you’re going to quote, try using the quote function so you can’t take anything out of context. Let me help you.
^ i do too. Even though its ricey as hell, it seems like he did put a good amount of time and work into it.
At no point in time was it quoted that he appreciates the work put into it. I’ll attempt to reiterate what he said in more comprehendable terms.
“Despite the fact that the car looks like a spaceship, it seems as if the owner of the vehicle put a lot of work into making the car the way it is.”
Let me also quote a few other honda “fanbois” for you.
that is an amazing piece of machinery…i mean piece of shit
wow. that makes me feel way better about my car.
holy rice ^^
apollo 13.
I don’t see anyone in this thread even attempting to justify the vehicle itself. It’s obviously apparent that the car has a lot of work into it. Rice or not.
So ya, in the end you’re only kidding yourself in an attempt to make yourself look cool at bashing “honda fanbois” by taking quotes out of context.
finding any good in that car is a joke… just like your muti-part post with 6 quotes
My post actually has context and logical thoughts with explanations. You’re just attempting to make a wise-crack at Honda owners. I don’t think anyone has said anything positive about the vehicle other than “hey, I like those rims.” It’s obvious that when he stated “he put a good amount of time and work into it” he meant “good” as in a “large quantity.”
context, yes… logical,no! I could respond to each part of your incredibly overthought post, but I’d rather not. It was a joke that wasn’t directed at any particular. I wasn’t trying to quote anyone or else I would have used the quote feature (yeah, I know all about it, thank a bunch).
I said honda fanboi, not honda owners. I guess you are saying that they mean the same, that every owner is a fanboi, yes?
only people that should get offended are those that are fanbois. Maybe you are one of them, I dunno.
understand?
Yes, I am one of them. Sure. Great. But you said “fanbois.” Which would be plural. It’d be one thing if it was a joke that was actually pertaining to a situation that was atleast truthful. But you took something out of context in attempts to make a joke directed at more than one person which can be assumed by your use of an “s” at the end of fanboi.
yes, there are many fanbois on this site, so whats your point?
saying anything positive, or even neutral, about that car is insane. It is an ultimate disaster. Honda fanbois will always fine something postive to say about their precious hondas, ALWAYS! There are all kinds of fanbois, but this thread is directed to the honda variety. The thread is called “hondas” and constantly gets bumped just to stir up the fanbois. So my fanboi reference is not only true, but completely on topic and not out of context at all.
I’m tired of saying “fanboi”
it is quite the disaster but I am still going to stand by saying those are nice wheels
…No honda fanboi found ANYTHING positive to say about that car! Reading comprehension > You. So no, your fanboi reference is not true, nor is it on topic.