THIS THREAD IS EPIC.
should be stickied. :deadhorse
+1 on the sticky
my only post on this topic is simple . built hondas are fucking great just like every other built car stock hondas suck like every other stock car.
:nod yea that is deep :mwahaha
i think most stock cars are, the new si’s are nice, the new GTI’s are nice factory… rs4’s outta the factory are nice. just to name a few…
Shitty stock cars: Supra, 3000GT, C5, C6, Ferrari (Pick one), Lambo (Pick one), Viper, etc…
i think he should have specified stock economy cars
:jawdrop
well there is one economy car on there.
yeah the 3000gt is an econo box, they came in the fwd n.a as the base model correct? the vr4 is just the badass version like the type-r that honda/acura has
The 3/S in no way was an econ box. It was Mitsubishi’s flag ship car for a decade. The NA still went for over $30K in the LOW/MID 90s.
well I didnt know that, what the hell did the vr4 go for then? like 40k??? I always thought the base 3000gt was a cheap econo-box
The sticker price of my car in 1996 was $46,900. The Spyders in 95/96 went for MID $6X and LOW $7X.
Consider Mitsubishi in the 1990s? Eclipse NA/Turbo, Eclipse Spyder NA/Turbo, 3000GT NA/Twin Turbo, 3000GT Spyder NA/Twin Turbo. They went downhill fast though.
damn, thats alot for a mitsubishi, its a wonder why they didnt sell very well, ya dont see to many around. :ponder
Sold more than Supras. 
oh, well I dont know much about either especially about how well they sold when I was 6 years old haha but you dont see much of either of those around.
Youngin’.
:
ahh what can I say, I still got plenty of life ahead of me
lmao@ this being a sticky
Fucking pricks who stickied this. :nono
Your car was really $46K new??? WTF thats alotta cash for the day. Hard to believe that the spyders were 60-70, thats nuts. Of course, and this kills me to say this, but thats when Mitsu was pumping out a good ammount of nice cars. I thought about getting a AWD Turbo Eclipse at one point, but then i smartened up :tong