twin screws are torque monsters though 
Us centri guys dont know what thats like. Though i do know of a KB GT that made 540rwhp/472rwtq…guess its all the flip of a coin.
125wtq 120whp
<–
136tq 114hp
N/A Vulva Power!!
[quote=“kingsario,post:22,topic:37471"”]
125wtq 120whp
[/quote]
Honda? BS! 
I used to, used to make 285wtq 270whp. Then was upto 394whp 390wtq. Next setup is going to be like 470whp and 375wtq.
i make much more Tq than Hp though I havent had it dynoed. 3.44" bore, 4.09" stroke and a small turbo will do that for you.
just shift a little earlier and stay in that torque band.
Brian
<----
not a chance in hell lol
[quote=“BluBalls”"]
my problem is that the tq peaks too low.
[/quote]
no such thing
at 18psi i get 260ft/lbs and 150 hp
:lolham:
280 brake torque, 260 brake hp. It was easy. I went to the dealership with a check. No knowledge required. :gay:
right here
A lot of things can make this happen , a cam being degreed for the powerband to be lower is one , different types of power adders on certain engine combos (pending bore and stroke) , nitrous , or sometimes an inefficiency issue or even the opposite depending on what the car is set up to do . Another could be if you were on a dyno using wheelspeed as an rpm pick up , this will give inflated torque numbers especially in a automatic trans car because it is not a true rpm pick up and don’t pay attention to dyno numbers on a dyno like this , it is not a good comparison tool to show you where you are (#'s wise) as opposed to others on most dynos , it is a tuning tool only . Just throwing these things out there for you , could be nothing’s wrong either .
me too
[quote=“BrockwayMT,post:31,topic:37471"”]
no such thing
[/quote]
unless I want to pull stuff around 
I don’t know, do they make a human(people) dyno?