Lunches seized from kids in debt

this article is just crazy

Lunches seized from kids in debt at Salt Lake City elementary
Education » School officials cite unpaid balances on students’ meal accounts.
By Lisa Schencker | The Salt Lake Tribune
First Published Jan 29 2014 05:29 pm • Last Updated Jan 29 2014 11:06 pm
Up to 40 kids at Uintah Elementary in Salt Lake City picked up their lunches Tuesday, then watched as the meals were taken and thrown away because of outstanding balances on their accounts — a move that shocked and angered parents.

“It was pretty traumatic and humiliating,” said Erica Lukes, whose 11-year-old daughter had her cafeteria lunch taken from her as she stood in line Tuesday at Uintah Elementary School, 1571 E. 1300 South.

Lukes said as far as she knew, she was all paid up. “I think it’s despicable,” she said. “These are young children that shouldn’t be punished or humiliated for something the parents obviously need to clear up.”

Jason Olsen, a Salt Lake City District spokesman, said the district’s child-nutrition department became aware that Uintah had a large number of students who owed money for lunches.

As a result, the child-nutrition manager visited the school and decided to withhold lunches to deal with the issue, he said.

But cafeteria workers weren’t able to see which children owed money until they had already received lunches, Olsen explained.

The workers then took those lunches from the students and threw them away, he said, because once food is served to one student it can’t be served to another.

Children whose lunches were taken were given milk and fruit instead.

Olsen said school officials told the district that their staffers typically tell students about any balances as they go through the lunch line and send home notifications to parents each week.

The district attempted to contact parents with balances via phone Monday and Tuesday, Olsen said, but weren’t able to reach them all before the child-nutrition manager decided to take away the students’ lunches.

“Something’s not working, and that’s what the school and child-nutrition department are going to work on together,” Olsen said of the notifications.

He said there’s no plan to use the same tactic at other district schools.

“This can be easily prevented,” Olsen said. “We need to make sure proper notification goes out to the parents and they have time to put money in the accounts.”

But Olsen said he would not describe the tactic as a mistake.

“If students were humiliated and upset,” Olsen said, “that’s very unfortunate and not what we wanted to happen.”

However, after further investigation, Olsen released an updated statement that was also posted to the district’s Facebook page. It said: “This situation could have and should have been handled in a different manner. We apologize.”

The post adds: “We understand the feelings of upset parents and students who say this was an embarrassing and humiliating situation. We again apologize and commit to working with parents in rectifying this situation and to ensuring students are never treated in this manner again.”

Olsen said it’s standard in the district to give kids fruit and milk in lieu of lunch if they don’t have the money to pay for lunch.

He said it’s unclear how Uintah had been handling such situations before this week. Attempts to reach Uintah’s principal were unsuccessful.

Olsen said the district encourages parents to use its electronic system to pay for lunches and set up email notifications. He said the software for the system is new this year, though it’s not much different than the old one.

Lukes said she never received a notification that her daughter would have her lunch taken.

She said it was a difficult day for her daughter and other kids. She said her daughter told her one of the cafeteria workers cried at the sight. And her daughter’s best friend was so upset that she went home Tuesday night and made lunches for all the students who had theirs taken, she said.

“You would think in a public school system your child wouldn’t be turned away from lunch,” Lukes said, “especially when people usually settle their balances.”

Says they were given milk and fruit…odds are that was more nutritional than what was being served anyways…and still another sign of how pussy this society has become…the kids were “traumatized” the article says…shut the fuck up…

“Something’s not working, and that’s what the school and child-nutrition department are going to work on together,” Olsen said of the notifications.

Yeah. It’s called the parents aren’t paying for the food their children are taking.

I just don’t see the point of throwing their food away after they already got it. Wasting it seems pretty retarded… just let them eat it at that point.

In a public school setting, this is so detrimental to a child, and wrong.

my thought is that the public humiliation is the part that shouldn’t happen. that and literally taking food out of the little kids hands. it’s just insane, there are so many better ways to deal with it.

Sounds like they need to reevaluate their “settling the lunch debt” situation. I don’t know about any other schools, but if I didn’t have my lunch money with me for the day, I didn’t even get crackers for lunch.

are you saying there was a day that forgot you lunch money, then talked to a teacher or worker and they told you to STFU and eat nothing in elementary school?

No, in that case they would most likely make an exception for that. I guess what I’m getting at is, how are these balances allowed to be outstanding? Is the school just letting parents slouch off and not pay for their lunches? It seems to me that the school is just as much at fault for letting the parents not pay their balances off before it got out of hand.

it shouldn’t matter how bad the parents are, you should never publicly humiliate little kids like this for something they didn’t do.

I never blamed the parents, I 100% put this on the school.

At Catholic school they are soup Nazis so this could never happen. lol

What about the parents raising their kids bad, causing them to misbehave? Should the school not take action on the kids in that case, because it’s the parent’s fault at the root?

yes the school should take action, but not against the kids and especially not publicly.

A child goes to school to learn, not to be humiliated, regardless of reason.

THIS.

You guys are upset that the “child-nutrition manager” aka the longest running lunch person made a poor decision which was probably one of many if that was their career…

bad parents
bad situation
bad judgement

I would love to know how past due they were

Facts:

Parents didn’t pay their bills
School mishandled the situation
Kids got screwed

If you don’t pay your utility bill and they shut off your water, are you going to call and complain to them that your kid didn’t get to shower before going to school? There is plenty of blame to go around here and none for the kids.

Stupid people making stupid decisions.

This is just stupid.

FACT: Public humiliation of a small child in a peer intensive environment will emotionally scar a child.

My wife’s a teacher, all her friends are teachers. Most of them at one point in time have had to reach into their own pockets for a child to eat. There is no excuse for this, it is a CHILD, with no ability to feed itself.