u sure thats not because ur god here?
see, its starting already, doesnt have anything to contribute to the debate so he attacks one spelling error…nice
Thing is…with society how it is today, even if I said “okay…PETA has the right approach”, I think everyone very well knows that we could not simply change things and go back to how agriculture was even 100 years ago. We’ve developed as a mass produced, low-cost, “available to everyone” kind of culture, and yes it is unfortunate, as with many things these days, but crying over it is like…well, crying over spilled milk.
Absolutely not.
If you want to argue intelligence, try and find a misspelled word in any of my responses… An intelligent person, who would, in turn, make an intelligent response, would probably have used the word ALLOWED, not it’s homonym.
just sayin
theres no way we could go back now. but they are one of the most liberal groups ive ever seen. like stopping the entire livestock and meat packing industry is going to have no effect on the american people or the US economy whatsoever. hang on let me make sure i spelled everything right.
I do have something to contribute.
but I’ve read what you wrote, and what newman wrote. Newman has pretty much covered anything I would have to say.
Dairy Cows and Chickens are the worst treated of anything, especially the large industries that grow/use/whatever with them.
I drink organic free range milk. I will never drink that cheap garbage that the store sells because the dairy cow just doesn’t not have a life, most are shoved in stalls, pumped hormones, impregnated, and abused so people can have cheap milk.
IMO that is completely fucked up. Chickens are in even worse shape. Hence why I almost never buy/eat eggs.
I have no problem eating beef/pork/venison as long as the animal actually had a life, and was just brought to a slaughter house when its time came.
lol, that’s a typo, and you caught it while i was proofreading…
aloud = stupidity
ok and would you like to shell out the extra tax money to make sure they are put in 5 star resort slaughter houses?
Honestly let’s forget about the spelling thing, it doesn’t matter. Your right though, and I’m sure Newman would agree also, although PETA is extremely liberal in their ideas and approaches towards animal right reforms, we as a culture are not physically, mentally, socially or economically prepared to give up what we have grown so accustomed to.
That’s a bad thing to have a liberal group. Every argument needs two sides one for, and one against. Let the people gather their own information, and make their own decisions.
If eating/ drinking milk, beef, chicken and pork wasn’t so cheap from the industrialized bullshit. Do you think people would care how the animals are treated… I think they would. Since its cheap, people are greedy/poor they turn their eyes and let it happen, so they can see the benefits, to buy more booze, or more cartons of cigarettes and be the white trash scum they are.
I’m not here to make a 5 start slaughter house… Just let the fucking animals live outside like they were originally intended to.
Not this
ok i guess i see where your coming from as far as ignoring the situation. but what are we gonna do? euthanize all of them? do you know how much that would cost and how much longer it would take than cutting off a bunch of their heads at once?
But while that is peta’s end goal, they realize that it’s not going to happen overnight and would take extensive infrastructure change.
Their goals for any foreseeable future is to reduce animal suffering. For instance, they would rather see people drink free range milk than that produced in a “dairy factory”. Obviously the end goal here is to totally eliminate dairy consumption, but that’s unrealistic and they know it.
Small steps.
Their radical end goals shouldn’t be used to condemn their realistic short term aspirations.
did you not read where my biggest reasoning for hating industrialized everything is the fact that the animal doesn’t have a decent life.
I understand if the animal is going to be slaughtered its gotta be done. 3 minutes of pain during the slaughter is much more acceptable of 1-4 years of terrible living conditions.
but anyone that is not lactose intollerant is going to drink milk. i dont believe there is any way to rally up the entire country or planet to do one thing, especially something like going from whole milk to free range milk, its not plausible. That is why i dont take them seriously. Do i feel bad for those animals, yes i do ive seen the videos of the chickens having their beaks cut off and thrown against walls, but to say that we need to change these ways shouldve happened back when this all started, and to throw paint on people wearing fur coats and radical things like that isnt going to help the situation at all is it?
I’m not lactose intolerant, I don’t drink milk. for the first time in 2 months I bought a 1/2 gallon and I’ve used it for dinner I made my roommates, then 2 times for cereal. Yes it was organic free range milk
Believe me, I have a serious gay infatuation with ice cream and chocolate milk
I think you have your terms confused… whole milk to free range milk is kind of a weird comparison. Industrialized milk to free range would be a better comparison
No, actually if we banned factory farming all of those animals would be eaten within months, and then our country would begin to starve. We wouldn’t have tons of animals, we would have no animals.
i am not lactose intolerant. i don’t drink milk.
There are a quantifiable number of dairy farms in the US. Peta supports legislation that would make these institutions more “humane”. By garnering public support, they hope to generate a public push for this kind of legislation.
People like to use long-term, radical goals as a reason to dismiss short-term, realistic goals.
Saying: “Fuck drinking free range milk because peta wants to make me a vegan!” is an example.
i meant industrialized but i couldnt find the word for it