Nerds, tell me about these proccessors

zwarbyt · July 6, 2006, 1:18pm

Cel-M 390 (1.70GHz Dothan 400MHz FSB)/256MB/40GB HP/DVD-CDRW/15.4WXGA/ATI X200M/802.11BG/LI4/XP HE/1-YR
Cel-M 370 (1.50GHz Dothan 400MHz)/256MB/40GB/DVD-CDRW/14.0 WXGA/INTEL 915GM/WiFi Antenna Only/XP HE/1-YR
Pent-M 740 (1.73GHz, 2MB L2 cache, 533MHz FSB)/256MB/40GB HP/DVD-CDRW/15.4WXGA/2200BG (802.11b/g)xXPRO/1-YR
SOLO T1300 (1.66GHZ), 15.4" WXGA TRUBRITE, 512MB, 60GB, DVDSUPERMULTI, 802.11ABG, WIN XP HOME
SOLO T1300 (1.66GHZ), 14.1" WXGA TRUBRITE, 512MB, 80GB, DVDSUPERMULTI, 802.11ABG, WIN XP HOME
DUO T2300 (1.66GHZ), 15.4" WXGA TRUBRITE, 1024MB, 100GB, DVDSUPERMULTI, 802.11ABG, WIN XP MCE
DUO T2300 (1.66GHZ), 14.1" WXGA TRUBRITE, 1024MB, 100GB, DVDSUPERMULTI, 802.11ABG, WIN XP MCE
Pent-M 760 (2.0GHz), 1024MB (512MBx2), 15.4 WXGA, Int. Graphics, 120GB, DVD-SuperMulti, (802.11b/g), WinXP-PRO, 1-Yr Warr

Intel Core™ Duo Processor T2400 (1.83GHz, 2MB L2, 667MHz FSB), 1024MB (512MBx2) DDR2 533MHz,17"WXGA+ (1440x900) [Up to 480 Cd/m2 (AC mode), CSV Ultra Bright - 2Lamps], Discreet Graphics, HDD1=80GB (5,400rpm, SATA),HDD2=80GB (5,400rpm, SATA), DVD SuperMulti (+/-R double layer) drive,Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG (802.11a/b/g),Bluetooth (v.2.0+EDR), WinXP MCE, 1-yr Warr.
Intel Core™ Duo Processor T2500 (1.83GHz, 2MB L2, 667MHz FSB), 1024MB (512MBx2) DDR2 533MHz,17"WXGA+ (1440x900) [Up to 480 Cd/m2 (AC mode), CSV Ultra Bright - 2Lamps], Discreet Graphics, HDD1=80GB (5,400rpm, SATA),HDD2=80GB (5,400rpm, SATA), DVD SuperMulti (+/-R double layer) drive,Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG (802.11a/b/g),Bluetooth (v.2.0+EDR), WinXP MCE, 1-yr Warr.

Pent-M 740 (1.73GHz, Dothan, 533MHz), 14.1" XGA, 256MB(DDR2 533MHz), 40GB(5,400rpm), DVD/CD-RW, Wi-Fi (802.11b/g), WinXP Pro SP2, 1-Yr Warr/NVIDIA GeForce 6600 graphics w/64MB VRAM
PentiumM 773 (1.3GHzULV Dothan), 12.1" XGA, 512MB[DDR2 400MHz: 256MB (on board)+ 256MB in slot], 80GB(4200 rpm), External Optical only, Wi-Fi (802.11b/g), BT V2.0+EDR, WinXP Pro, 3-Yr Warr

Core Solo T1300 1.66GHZ, 15.4" W-TRUBRITE, 512MB, 802.11ABG, 80GB, CDRW/DVD, WIN XP PRO

T2400 1.83; 14.1X; 512MB; 945GM; SATA 80G; 12.7MM DVD SUPERMULTI;INTEL(A/G),WINXP PRO; 3YR

which is the fastest… work owes me a new laptop…

Locutus · July 6, 2006, 1:21pm

i bet one dollar bob

Joe · July 6, 2006, 1:23pm

Core Duo 1.83GHz.

The core duo and core solo are the replacements/next gen for the pentium M.

Intel Core™ Duo Processor T2400 (1.83GHz, 2MB L2, 667MHz FSB), 1024MB (512MBx2) DDR2 533MHz,17"WXGA+ (1440x900) [Up to 480 Cd/m2 (AC mode), CSV Ultra Bright - 2Lamps], Discreet Graphics, HDD1=80GB (5,400rpm, SATA),HDD2=80GB (5,400rpm, SATA), DVD SuperMulti (+/-R double layer) drive,Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG (802.11a/b/g),Bluetooth (v.2.0+EDR), WinXP MCE, 1-yr Warr.

sounds like the win

zwarbyt · July 6, 2006, 1:28pm

holy chit that one has a tv tuner built in…

don’t know if they’ll go for that

whatever i get has to run vista

Joe · July 6, 2006, 1:29pm

make sure you get at least a gig of ram then

BuickGN · July 6, 2006, 1:43pm

they all suck, since theres no AMD present

Joe · July 6, 2006, 2:17pm

AMD in laptops :mamoru:

zwarbyt · July 7, 2006, 5:44am

these are stock toshiba’s buddy

so look again and tell me, exclude the two duo models cause they are HUUUUUGE

BuickGN · July 7, 2006, 5:48am

Pent-M 760 (2.0GHz), 1024MB (512MBx2), 15.4 WXGA, Int. Graphics, 120GB, DVD-SuperMulti, (802.11b/g), WinXP-PRO, 1-Yr Warr

BuickGN · July 7, 2006, 5:49am

??? your point?

RuBiCaNT · July 7, 2006, 5:53am

Hahhaa, Keving gets all butt-hurt when people pick on AMD. They are not quite there with notebook performance IMO, but hopefully soon.

Core Duo FTW!!

zwarbyt · July 7, 2006, 5:57am

thanks

BuickGN · July 7, 2006, 6:00am

the turion 64 kicks ass in laptops, at least the ones we get here at work. lol yes my ass is sore now. of course they dont play games or anything here.

RuBiCaNT · July 7, 2006, 6:12am

Get this one Zwarbutt…

Intel Core™ Duo Processor T2500 (1.83GHz, 2MB L2, 667MHz FSB), 1024MB (512MBx2) DDR2 533MHz,17"WXGA+ (1440x900) [Up to 480 Cd/m2 (AC mode), CSV Ultra Bright - 2Lamps], Discreet Graphics, HDD1=80GB (5,400rpm, SATA),HDD2=80GB (5,400rpm, SATA), DVD SuperMulti (+/-R double layer) drive,Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG (802.11a/b/g),Bluetooth (v.2.0+EDR), WinXP MCE, 1-yr Warr.

BuickGN · July 7, 2006, 6:21am

sigh

lol

sureshot007 · July 7, 2006, 6:25am

Remind me again why I need 1gb of ram to run an OS layer, just so that I can run a word processor and type a letter?

Daddie · July 7, 2006, 6:26am

Actually, AMD processors fair pretty well with extra low power consumption.

It’s just the chipsets that have been the bottleneck.

Dr.Stevil · July 7, 2006, 6:33am

If those are the only things you want, then I’m almost positive that you can run vista with less (much like shutting down apps in services.msc in XP). No bells and whistles (aka win 2000 style theme), ect.

but then why even bother with vista if thats all your doing? hell, win 3.1 will do that

sureshot007 · July 7, 2006, 6:35am

My point exactly. Most people that use computers (barring n3rds) are only surfing the web casually and checking email. MS has gone off the deep end.

BuickGN · July 7, 2006, 6:40am

are u kidding me?

most ppl only surf the web?, lol dude what about people who actually us pcs to work, design, etc…

at least M$ is releasing new os’ every decade or so, they could of been content with xp and left it at that. new is good sometimes. especially with all its built in security stuff.