damn, I thought i read it a while back and it said station wagons were ok.
i have a tint ticket pending on my dd; I’m going to plead the limousine case. it’s a 735il, with an extended wheelbase and all the features the front has are also applicable to the rear. I got the ticket my 6th day of owning the car, and said the tint was from a prev owner.
why on earth is everyone so married to the idea of their illegal tint
[/quote]
Because cars like mine need some tint…35% on both the SHO and the Mustang is deemed necessary in my book. However, I’m a designer by profession and I tend to lean more to form over function sometimes:wiggle:
legal tint doesnt do anything. the windows are just as clear.
my main reason for tint is i have my hockey equipment in my back seat all the time (I’m a goalie so it doesnt all fit in the trunk) and I don’t want people to see it whenever they walk by
Seriously, how is the cop a douche bag for doing his job?
[/quote]
While I’m not defending the bitching and complaining, just because someone is doing they’re job doesn’t mean they can’t be a complete douchebag at the same time.
[quote=“ly555is,post:24,topic:35300"”]
why on earth is everyone so married to the idea of their illegal tint
[/quote]
Because some people value privacy, protection from theft, an interior without sun damage and other cosmetic reasons, but I’m sure your fully aware of that…
[quote=“ly555is,post:24,topic:35300"”]
take the shit off, put just a legal amount on the rear window
[/quote]
That = retarded and would be pointless/not beneficial at all.
Auto glass blocks the majority of UV rays right from the factory. I looked into this when my progessive eyeglass lenses would never turn dark when I was in the car, even driving straight at a setting sun. Step out of the car and poof, dark lenses.