damn, I thought i read it a while back and it said station wagons were ok.
i have a tint ticket pending on my dd; I’m going to plead the limousine case. it’s a 735il, with an extended wheelbase and all the features the front has are also applicable to the rear. I got the ticket my 6th day of owning the car, and said the tint was from a prev owner.
Because cars like mine need some tint…35% on both the SHO and the Mustang is deemed necessary in my book. However, I’m a designer by profession and I tend to lean more to form over function sometimes:wiggle:
legal tint doesnt do anything. the windows are just as clear.
my main reason for tint is i have my hockey equipment in my back seat all the time (I’m a goalie so it doesnt all fit in the trunk) and I don’t want people to see it whenever they walk by
While I’m not defending the bitching and complaining, just because someone is doing they’re job doesn’t mean they can’t be a complete douchebag at the same time.
Because some people value privacy, protection from theft, an interior without sun damage and other cosmetic reasons, but I’m sure your fully aware of that…
That = retarded and would be pointless/not beneficial at all.
Auto glass blocks the majority of UV rays right from the factory. I looked into this when my progessive eyeglass lenses would never turn dark when I was in the car, even driving straight at a setting sun. Step out of the car and poof, dark lenses.