Found this on another forum
Not really any details on the test but its still fun watching two high end american sports car get piss pounded.
Have to watch this during lunch. I have the results already.
Excellent commentary…
Screeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeech, Waaaaaaaaa, Scrrrrreeeeeeeccchhhhh, WAAAAAAAA, WAAAAA, SCREEEECCHHHHHH, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
I’d take the Zed06.
>
Oh, wait… it’s the same for street cars, Vette > Viper
Viper Fanbois :tantrum:
vett for cost and performance but I LOVE the newer vipers styling.
the vette and the viper look the same now.
That video was ghey.
Hey retard, I own a SHO too and agree about the Vipers styling being damn nice. Also, I’d like to point out your Porsche isn’t known to be very stylish itself…
oh here we go…
the tauras was NEVER designed to be a good looking car… ti was meant to carry groceries… if ford never did a SHO model with a yamaha motor, they never would be considered enthusiast cars…
and i dont think anybody can say that the SHO was a pretty car… where MOST porsche cars were designed with beauty in mind and performance…
but i digress
c7r > viper competition coupe
This is JUST a little more realistic of a review:
Car and Driver has been blowing chevy for as long as I can remember. Fair? yeah, sure.
A couple thoughts then I’m out…
- Z06 is an amazing machine…Viper’s pretty stout as well. i’d LOVE to own either one.
- Taurus was designed to be good looking…in the 80’s when it was released. If I recall correctly that car paved the way for the end of the conventional box that most car companies were producing.
- You’re right, without the SHO, no one would follow the Taurus. The only thing people like about the SHO’s were the engines. Everyone knows the platform blows.
- the 944/951 doesn’t fit the bill of being designed with beauty in mind…that was saved for the 959. So hearing a comment about ‘coming from a SHO owner’ is a bit much.
- Even though I own a SHO, I don’t like the car…by todays standards it’s garbage. But for it’s time it held its own.
- I find great irony in the fact that those who rip on other cars tend to have debatable cars themselves.
Please dont try and quote numbers, you just make yourself look like a fool. The 959 in it’s time wasnt even considered a good looking car, the reason it had such a following was it was the first production car to have zero lift. Which is why the body is designed the way it is, and because they wanted it based off the 911 for homologation purposes for Group B, IMSA, and Paris Dakar. It was their cheater car for production classes. 944 isnt a good looking car? Then why did Mazda acknowledge the FC was completely a ripoff of it due to it’s successes in the styling department? SHO got away from box like styling? Are you fucking BLIND?
Oh and at the same time ford was producing this pile of dog shit
BMW was producing this:
Germany > *
god i hate that pile of dogshit…turbos or not. just drop it - they suck…not even worth arguing.
Jealous cause yours doesn’t?
GT-R > Vette > Viper
that’s right, i went there…