Anyways, I’m not for gun control, but statistically, as in if you look at facts and data, it works.
That’s from the US Department of Justice. The Brady Bill was enacted in 1993. I can think of a great argument against the correlation between the brady bill and a drop in violent crime, but lets see if anyone else can think with their brain instead of their inbox.
Ah nevermind, my lunch break is too short and I need to focus on my studying.
Big drop in violent crime shortly after the Brady Bill. There was also a big surge in the economy, you know when Reaganomics finally took hold. ;). So does gun control = less violent crime or does less poor people = less violent crime?
When a government bans guns, do they pay you for them? I mean besides the fact that they are taking my possessions, which I have a right to own, do they have to re-pay you for them?
I know guys that have literally 10’s of thousands invested into their guns. It would suck if it went poof.