Posted with Bing’s permission
Hello son240 members,
But I was wondering how many of you would benefit/need OEM retrofitting components (as well as better performing replicas) at very competitive prices?
I’m currently working for a company in the states, and have already worked with TM3, and received a shipment of Mazda 3 specific clear lenses that offer quite an improvement over stock for their OEM projectors.
I know you guys don’t come stock with projectors, but would there be many that would retrofit their headlights if there was a more convenient means of sourcing high quality components?
I have sources for TSX/FX-R/TL and even upcoming S2k-R projectors, as well as the supporting shrouds.
Please keep this topic on-topic, as it will be under review. Please post up if you’d be interested, because if there’s enough expressed interest, I’ll join up with the other vendors, in providing the local community with more options, and safety on the roads!
Here’s a few pictures of an FX-R projector; a lot better than the TSX, just as compact (taller, but less wide), significantly cheaper, and bi-xenon to boot!
Have fun!
Here’s a comparison of a Replica FX and an Oem S2000. Keeping the same environment with my other posts. Car is parked about 45ft from wall. Projectors used 35w D2S 85122+ (no Hg) bulb and matsushita ballast. Nikon D60 camera manual setting with ISO800, Aperture 1/4’, and F6.3
In this comparison, both projectors are shown on the same wall at the same time. This gives a better comparison output than having each projector on at one time. Also, each projector will be tilted sideway so that it will not give advantage over the other, eg. as in the case of top vs bottom. Enjoy.
Here’s the top-and-bottom comparison. The bottom projector always appear better and brighter. I swapped position on each projector so there’s no advantage of one over the other.
Replica FX (top) vs. Oem S2K (bottom)
Replica FX (bottom) vs. Oem S2K (top)
Replica FX (top) vs. Oem S2K (bottom)
Replica FX (bottom) vs. Oem S2K (top)
Replica FX (top) vs. Oem S2K (bottom)
Replica FX (bottom) vs. Oem S2K (top)
Here are the Side-By-Side comparison. This method is a better comparsion.
Replica FX (left) vs. Oem S2K (right)
Replica FX (bottom) vs. Oem S2K (top)
Replica FX (left) vs. Oem S2K (right)
Replica FX (bottom) vs. Oem S2K (top)
Replica FX (left) vs. Oem S2K (right)
Replica FX (bottom) vs. Oem S2K (top)
The oem S2K is a lot wider than the replica FX. It also has more intensity along the sides. However, the replica has an even intensity along the side from top to bottom whereas the S2K is intense just below the cutoff line. Personally, I like that thin intense streak of light on the S2K. Both projectors are equally sharp. The S2K has a better intense spread in the center. The replica FX has more blue in the center. The s2k softened on the upper left side, a common signature.
Please, do not rely on these pics to come to any conclusion. When you deal with mods, lens swapping, and custom shields, the results will be different for different retrofitters. S2Ks are different from year to year. I have my own preferences and not promoting any projector over the other. Lastly, do you own testing to come to your final answer. More to come (modded s2k vs …)