YEEEE HAWWWW BOY, I SEE DAT DEM DURRR OSSSAAAA MAAWWW FELLER! GETTUM!
hydrogen=the answer
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1400360016821042640&q=hydrogen+combustion+engine&total=64&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
Larsen Hydrogen Engine
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4858425412744522460&q=hydrogen+engine&total=384&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=4
300hp/900tq^^
opposed8
banks turn off
power instantaneous
siqqq
you do realize that there is no easy way to produce hydrogen in large amounts, its either from using fossil fuels or electrolysis with water. Therefore hydrogen=not the answer
YET. Being one of the most abundant elements, it is a superb choice and a matter of time before a system is developed.
Hydrogen + Fusion = Answer.
And Lutz is wrong, him and Bedard need to go suck eachother’s dicks.
I can’t believe the number of ignorant people on here.
Yes there have been cycles in Co2 and temperature on this planet, but scientist have proven that they have never been higher than what they are now.
I don’t even know why I am bothering to get into it.
More talking from Lutz
As part of a campaign against higher fuel economy standards, Lutz wrote in a 2006 blog posting that forcing automakers to sell smaller cars would be “like trying to address the obesity problem in this country by forcing clothing manufacturers to sell smaller, tighter sizes.”