All I have here to show is the facts. It is what it is. You can twist everything around that you want to.
The pulls shown are the first and the last pull done. Simple, how it came in and how it left. I have no problem showing anyone who wants to stop buy everything logged by the dyno, when the pulls were done and how long in between.
Mike if you still have your map saved, You are more then welcome to come out to the shop, Load it in the car and put it back on the dyno. We can do it live on webcam so everyone can watch.
This car took a long time to do and we had schedules to work around. IT was done on two different days. However when the car was finished the temp was about the same and the humidity was 100% so it may have a little more in it.
Do we really need to look at your long history of “facts”, contradictory statements and lies on this forum?
Not to mention you clearly stated you have it out for Innovative in another topic, yeah, I’m surrrrreee there is nothing fishy going on here. :rolljerk:
Not to mention, 4 days to tune an almost stock car with a few bolt ons. :roflpicard:
I figured as much. Probably 10 means each plotted point is an average of 10 raw data points? Is that the difference in how smooth the retune is vs the original run? I thought I saw a similarly noisy graph on here and that all that noise was attributed to the tie down straps being loose or something?
I hope this thread doesn’t get too shitted up by drama. This stuff is right up my control systems alley. I’d like to learn something. :tup:
This whole thread, and any stab at IT/Mike is just completely out of line.
Didn’t you work at IT at some point in time? I seem to remember Mike posting that you were doing some work on cars at his shop around the time they moved to the newer shop.
Maybe you should take some classes in Business Ethics at some point…It’s irrelevant, but just an FYI, I would never recommend anyone go to your shop after seeing the way you converse on this forum.
It’s just because you’re used to big turbos that can breath up top. ~ 10 psi is fine for 1.5 psi peak power, but the midrange is where it shows. It’s like a bunch of tests we did on John’s car putting on different intakes. Peak power may have only been 3 whp, but the midrange was where all the difference was.
Shit, my car is the best candidate! My power up top is not much different from 21 psi - 30 psi, but the midrange is about 60+ whp different, and torque is… infinite, :pedo:
The fact of the matter is if he’s going to be throwing out this bs constantly he better expect it back. He raised the boost so there is no measure of comparison here. The fact that he even made this thread in attempt to bash mike is laughable.
People will argue that emery does good work. Well guess what, so did hitler but he was a jerkoff. But anyways, at the very least emery’s threads give me a good laugh during the day
i feel sorry for chris and his 2005 LGT, when would you get in the middle of a pissing contest.
if chris was “unhappy” with mikes tune, he should have spoke to mike. i am sure mike would have given him what ever he wanted… if he was “unhappy” and went emery, that was his decision. Emery should have evaluated the situation and asked him to return to mikes shop, bc he didnt want to deal with the drama…end of story.
i wouldnt question the two well know shops, i would question chris…
it’s not a problem that someone was dissatisfied with mike and went to another shop. if that’s how they want to handle a situation, then fine. The real problem is Emery doing everything in his power to discredit IT with posts like this.
