Buick ties Lexus for quality
For the first time in 12 years, Toyota’s luxury brand shares the top spot in a vehicle-dependability survey. GM and Ford brands captured three of the top five spots.
By The Associated Press
Buick tied with Lexus as the highest-ranking brand in a closely watched study of vehicle dependability, marking the first time in 12 years that Lexus has shared the top award, J.D. Power and Associates said Thursday.
Cadillac, Mercury and Honda rounded out the top five brands in the annual survey, which measures problems experienced by the original owners of three-year-old vehicles.
Both Buick and Lexus had 145 problems per 100 vehicles. The worst-performing brand, Land Rover, had 398 problems. The industry average was 216 problems, down from 227 in last year’s survey.
The whole article…
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/SavingandDebt/SaveonaCar/MostDependableCar.aspx
again, :tup: to GM. Although I’m not a buick fan by any means
3 years @ 12k miles per = 36,000 = JUST ending warranty period(for some brands)
Lets see like 60K+ miles / 5+ years
JayS
August 10, 2007, 7:14am
8
[quote=“Toda Party,post:7,topic:33680"”]
3 years @ 12k miles per = 36,000 = JUST ending warranty period(for some brands)
Lets see like 60K+ miles / 5+ years
[/quote]
Don’t you have a forum you should be restoring?
Buicks don’t break because:
the owners never press the pedals hard enough to break anything
The owners either drive them 15k miles over 5 years or get in an accident before a warranty item might break
I wish buick would vanish :lol:
[quote=“JayS,post:8,topic:33680"”]
Don’t you have a forum you should be restoring?
[/quote]
talk to haner
[quote=“STEALTTH,post:9,topic:33680"”]
Buicks don’t break because:
the owners never press the pedals hard enough to break anything
The owners either drive them 15k miles over 5 years or get in an accident before a warranty item might break
I wish buick would vanish :lol:
[/quote]
Too old to notice the:
Muffler fell off.
Car wont do more than 33 MPH.
3)Windows don’t go down.
Anti lock & traction control are inop.
for the really old, car won’t start.
Feel free to add your own reasons.
Hey wait, I drive a Buick!!
[quote=“STEALTTH,post:9,topic:33680"”]
Buicks don’t break because:
the owners never press the pedals hard enough to break anything
The owners either drive them 15k miles over 5 years or get in an accident before a warranty item might break
I wish buick would vanish :lol:
[/quote]
:lol:
My 94 Lesabre with 144k on it has no issues other than usual maint for something that old.
my aunt has a newer lacrosse, I hate the friggin thing. I keep telling her to get away from buick. IMO they’re gonna be the next oldsmobile.
I have a mercury mini-van and I don’t think that’s to well put together either.
eMKay
August 10, 2007, 9:24am
15
Initial quality is really not a measure of dependability, long term reliability is, so you have to look at Consumer Reports and look how the vehicle does after 5 years or so.
BigRon
August 10, 2007, 9:55am
16
[quote=“Toda Party,post:7,topic:33680"”]
3 years @ 12k miles per = 36,000 = JUST ending warranty period(for some brands)
Lets see like 60K+ miles / 5+ years
[/quote]
Buick does have a 4/50k bumper to bumper and a 5/100 powertrain
Bacon
August 10, 2007, 12:51pm
17
[quote=“STEALTTH,post:9,topic:33680"”]
Buicks don’t break because:
the owners never press the pedals hard enough to break anything
The owners either drive them 15k miles over 5 years or get in an accident before a warranty item might break
I wish buick would vanish :lol:
[/quote]
Hahaha, how true.
I love it. Honda could put their badge on a Vega and sell it and you’d dyed in the wool domestic haters would stand behind it.
In other news my Ford and my Chevrolet are currently broken. :smash2:
91MR2
August 10, 2007, 9:06pm
19
[quote=“eMKay,post:15,topic:33680"”]
Initial quality is really not a measure of dependability, long term reliability is.
[/quote]
For real, end this thread, it’s completely pointless. Buick comparable to a Yota?
:hang: