Oh, i see what you did there. Meh, they’d probably allow marijuana, seeing as how it would obviously keep their stock of bulk candy moving.
Cigarettes are bad for you, but weed has no negative physical effects.
now mental effects on the other hand…
you truely are a moron if this is what you believe.
Are you fucking serious? :picard:
agreed
Actually i did read smoking weed does not increase your chance for lung cancer. I think i might have also read you actually has a less likely chance of developing lung cancer as opposed to someone who doesnt smoke. Not to sure if its true or not. Just something i’ve seen a few times.
ughhhh. Exactly why threads like this suck big donkey dick.
layziejr4, are you high?
ever wonder how people can pick out pot smokers by the way the talk? that is a side affect
I’m sorry what?:picard:
no, you are wrong.
The researchers interviewed 79 lung cancer patients and sought to identify the main risk factors for the disease, such as smoking, family history and occupation. The patients were questioned about alcohol and cannabis consumption.
In this high-exposure group, lung cancer risk rose by 5.7 times for patients who smoked more than a joint a day for 10 years, or two joints a day for 5 years, after adjusting for other variables, including cigarette smoking.
“While our study covers a relatively small group, it shows clearly that long-term cannabis smoking increases lung cancer risk,” wrote Beaseley.
Let’s poll 80 people that have lung cancer. If they’ve smoked weed in their life, then the weed must have caused it.
:picard: that’s the stupidest article I’ve ever read. 80 people in the study? srsly? :picard::picard:
O look I can post a link too. Yay me.
[quote=]
May 23, 2006 – People who smoke marijuana do not appear to be at increased risk for developing lung cancer, new research suggests.
While a clear increase in cancer risk was seen among cigarette smokers in the study, no such association was seen for regular cannabis users.
Even very heavy, long-term marijuana users who had smoked more than 22,000 joints over a lifetime seemed to have no greater risk than infrequent marijuana users or nonusers.[/quote]
I must be high. I can’t even read anymore.
im convinced you can find studies that say anything on the internet.
anyways, use your fucking brain. inhaling smoke of any kind is not going to be good for you.
:gotme: Problem solved?
oops…
I know quite a few people that smoke and are suprisingly really smart. Its the stoners that have nothing better to do then to sit around and get high all day with unproductive lives that become idiots. Its all about the persons lifstyle and will-power. If you live a productive life and push yourself to be successful and smoke everynow and then you’ll have no problem. BUT… if you have no money… shitty job… and lazy don’t smoke because you’ll get used to that lifestyle; and dig yourself into a hole you’ll be too lazy to get out of. Every weekly earning will incorporate your need to smoke rather then save for somthing that you need. The only excitment you’ll get out of life is that high everytime you light up.
In my opinion weed is not even close to be as deadly as cigerettes, and I’m talking about smoking it. Use a vaporizor and theres no smoke just pure thc, and the only ill effect found is loss of the least active brain cells but also in-turn has been known to increase brain activity overall. Theres weed smokers that do it in moderation, then you have the ones that smoke everyday; and that corrolates which alcohalics in a way I think. By making it legal I think that it can be regulated just like alcohal and tabacoo so that my little brother, sister, or children arn’t exposed to it at a young age.
Although, I don’t think it would have a negative effect but theres always a chance.
All I want is for anyone who smokes anything (cigars, weed, cigs, crack, etc) to smoke it away from me so i don’t have to smell it.
I was driving behind a broad puffin down a ciggie the other day. I could smell it through the vents. God damn I was pissed.
you ready to go in?