I love the Ford GT, but it by no means crushes the ZO6, or even beats it…
http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews/coupes/0511_z06_gt_viper/stats.html
Performance specs on page 4. Remember, the ZO6 has the worst tires by far and would be signifigantly faster around the track if it were equipped with the tires that the Viper/GT come with.
So beating it around the same track doesnt qualify as beating it?
HA. you’re taking results from someone that can only run a fucking 12.2 in a GT!!! Come on, i’m a tenth offa that in a non-pullied terminator. LOL
I’m assuming the each car was driven as badly as the next, making it a ‘fair’ comparision:tongue
That particular measurement of performance, sure. Just pointing out that the Ford GT does not ‘crush’ the ZO6 in any kind of timed/measured performance.
Ive seen a stock GT run 11.8 at LVD. It got beat by some kind of Mercedes AMG that ran 11.7.
AMG was probably my friend Mark, total sleeper. Was it black?
TTGT>*
Its been a year or two so Im not totally sure but it was either black or dark gray.
C6Z>KR
KR is a dumpy mustang
I thought all Mustangs were dumpy? :lol j/k
I think some of you are missing the point. There aren’t comparing the two cars straight up, they are saying, what is a better car for $80K. The obvious choice is the Z06.
uhm 114? my cousins stock gt500 + kn filter i beleive its an 06(?) went 11.9@117mph at LBV on eagle f1s…I mean cmon anyone who goes 114mph in the 1/4 with a KR is a fucking clown
welllllll…whoever buys an 80k KR is probably buying it as a collectors car. at least that is the only reason that i can think of. bc its a BIG waste of money imo!!