OK.
It’s still a RSX which is their entry level car.
OK.
It’s still a RSX which is their entry level car.
You are talking about opinion/perception, I am simply saying that the major car manufacturer’s entry level car = econbox.
To be honest, it doesn’t matter. I haven’t heard even real arguments other than some irrelevant justification from him.
acura rsx is a fuckin rebadged civic… still a fucking econobox… the civic si and the rsx-s have the same motor… different levels of ecu tuning… both k20’s… honda fanboi’s wont admit it or accept it but its a damned fact…the evo, the sti, the 3000gt… all the pinnacle of their respective company’s achievement… the rsx… not so much.
vag owns bugatti and they are a major car manufacturer theres a bugatti econobox? and im certainly not a honda fanboi id take my slow ass vw over a type-s anyday
think of status mcbitchin… it comes down to status. unless ur in an s2k or an nsx… maybe even a TL… owning a honda or acura is not a status symbol… an r32 for vw is status… where a regular golf or jetta… not so much… see where im going with this?
You know you win a debate when this type of post gets made. :nono
I’ll break it down for you.
Acura RSX = Honda Civic = Acura/Honda = entry level car = Relatively cheap $20K
The same goes for the Mitsubishi Lancer regardless of options. For the record, the Evolution (while looking similiar) is a different platform.
Disagree? That’s fine. Most WILL agree with me.
But, who cares? We are off topic. I want to hear this K20 > 6G72TT logic. So far, I heard some nutty shit.
shawn whats the stock hp rating for the 6g72? whats the stock hp for the k20? iirc the 6g is around 300hp… and the k20 is 200hp… now… thats still a 100hp/litre engine… i fail to see how one is better than the other.
my age says nothing about my skill level and thats a very ignorant thing to say. you have no idea who i am or what ive done and yes i have taken several cars down the strip. and its unfortunate that you werent able to gain .3 from loosing 300lbs. and the top 3 cars that acura have produce after the dc2 are the dc5 integra(rsx), probably the cl 3.2typeS, and the nsx. i will agree with you that the new civic si borrow its suspension and powerplant from the rsx. the fact of the matter is that acura does not exist. its all honda. hondas top cars would have to be judged in stock by comparing power/weight, track times, and popularity based on those first 2 things. probably would look something like nsx, s2000,dc5 typeR, dc2 typeR, so on so forth down the line
so if thats the case compare other differences. like NA vs turbo for instance
320CHP or 255AWHP 3.0L
Looks like I win and I didn’t even use a $5 bleeder valve for the other 50+
im officially dumber for reading this. i want my 30 seconds back
That’s ridiculous. You made a claim. Please back it up with something other than irrelevant information about your your car and its hypothetical timeslips.
Also, explain above? Do you really want to compare adding a turbo to a K20 for comparison? :lol
Do you proof read your posts before submitting? I am having a difficult time following even your thought process and it’s making it difficult for me to own you.
lol post of the month
so your saying that your reading comprehension is garbage? sorry dude :
i believe he is saying that your arguement is choppy and incoherent.
ummmmmmmmmmm…what the fuck r u sayin tard
i’m sorry but what the FUCK are you saying there?.. Honda = Acura, Honda is the mother company…the CL-S 3.2 is one of the gayest/worst cars Acura has made, why would you put that in comparison with an NSX?
:crackup :rofl
There is already a turbo K-Series motor, it’s the K23, it makes somewhere in the ballpark of 260/270 for power, not near the 6g72tt power but it seems like a good motor non the less
Even owning a K20, i highly disagree with the K20 > 6g72tt statement…
whoa ok i just went back and re-read what i wrote andyour definately right. lol. its pretty hard for even me to follow. i guess i was typing slower than my brain was going. its definately hard to read, i was replying to multiple posts without quoting. if i had quoted the posts i was replying to it would be alot easier to understand.
that was nessecary why? :confused
That’s one way of looking at it. Or, your posts are retarded. :tong
Given the other member’s responses. I guess it’s not me…
truth hurts? :lol