:crackup :crackup :haha
sorry dude your wrong. the 6g72 is a 3.0liter…so ya
anyway guys its ben fun, im just tired of arguing with people i dont even know on a personal level. it realy makes no sense and im gonna call it quits for now. you guys can praise whatever motor you like. i just have to come to the realization that some people just dont like hondas. i just refused to understand it because i think they are such a well rounded car. a great base for any type of racing (excluding drift lol). thanks for the exciting conversation. ;D
pretty good time to me ;D
umm the 276chp and 138hp/litre was in reference to the 2.0 litre EVO 4g63t… stock…
Just caught up on the last few pages and basically to sum up:
Travis is an idiot.
6g72 > k20
RSX=econobox.
sound good?
edited for good measure…
…so ya
well either way comparing NA and turbo motors is apples to oranges they are just not the same platform and comparing their hp/liter doesnt make sense. pull the turbo off the 4g63t and whats the hp. it just doesnt make sense.
oh boy… you just played right into that… the motor was DESIGNED around the turbo… it doesnt work as you’ve described. :nono
that was my point…its not NA factory so comparing the two would involve either turboing the k20, or de-turboing the 4g. im saying they cant be compared. so my arugment is meaningless
HAHAHAH I KNEW you were going to respond with that. When any honda boy gets beaten at their own game they gotta throw some ridiculous scenario in there to give them the edge. Take the turbo off, remove two cyclinders, take out some valves… HAHAHAH
You are the one that did the NA vs FI comparison and HP/L you fool.
saw it comming a MILE away
so im a fool then. have fun guys.
you said it, not me.
Nice try. :lol
I am working on Cliff Notes for this recent debate. Do you have PowerPoint installed? Maybe Visio is a better option? :confused
so i take it you have alot of spare time. :lol
Flipping burgers for a living makes that possible.
lol… shawn made a funny
:lol