Ok now I guess were gonna get on the argument that HP/Liter means nothing…lol
YAAA WOOOO, I have a 2.0L and it makes 42 Pavement Pounding Pones! This is basically what your saying…Now who dosent know what the fuck their talking about?
The Honda Civic DX is a car known for its great mileage. In 1980 a civic had 67 horsepower (HP) and a 1.5 liter (L) engine size. 67 HP / 1.5 L = 44.6 HP per liter. In 1994 the same trim civic had 102 HP with a 1.5 L engine. 102 / 1.5 L = 68 HP per liter. In 2007 the same trim civic had 140 HP and a 1.8 L engine. 140 / 1.8 L = 77 HP / liter. As can be seen, we are making more and more HP per liter but the car itself went from 32 MPG to 34 MPG between 1980 and 2007, respectively. Granted, this is a 2 MPG improvement (and improvement of 5% from 1980 to 2007) but horsepower increased from 44 HP/L to 77 HP/L (and improvement of 42% from 1980 to 2007!). Its amazing that we have the technical experience and ingenuity to improve our HP / L ratio by 42%. In 1980 the Civic weighed 1797 lbs but in 2007 it ballooned to 2586 an increase of 800 pounds!
in other words if you were engineering this shit you would have lost the world or whoever you were working for 30 years w/ your mentality.
FUCK YOU, I WIN!
http://www.chefseattle.com/articles/3145-miles-per-gallon-car.html
I think your just jelous for those of us that have “neons and altezzas…”
Who the fuck is this kid?..Your recockulous! You better do some research before you go throwing that “ricer” term around. There’s some ricers in this forum, just like any, but MOST of the ppl that your arguing with are FAR from it.