[quote=“90NA300ZX,post:5010,topic:25170"”]
Agree to disagree…
It wasn’t clearly seen in the video that the puck itself was over the line, but the puck was under the pad, which crossed the line…
Just because you can not physically see the puck itself in NO WAY means it’s inconclusive…if the puck is under the pad, and the pad is over the line, one can easily conclude that the puck is across the line as well…but since you can’t see the puck itself, no goal…fucking stupid call…
[/quote]
Kinda like how Miller had the puck underneath him in the Islanders series and it was called no goal? Kinda like that? Because any idiot could tell you that it was underneath him when he was across the line. But since you couldn’t physically SEE the puck over the line, it wasn’t a goal.
I can’t believe some of you are still crying about that. It’s not like it happened in OT and then the Rangers scored on the next faceoff.