The guy who was shot, had just been released from serving a 10+ year prison sentence for attempted murder of a police officer (AKA - He shot at some cops a decade ago) and the cop who shot him, was involved in that shooting. So yeah, I’m pretty sure the cop had every right to be suspicious of him…again. When people attempt to kill you, you kind of tend to remember that thing.
@Beck
Good find and…agreed
The new rounds being developed are amazing. They are increasing velocity and initial takedown, while also increasing internal fragmenting to decrease collateral damage. It’s really interesting stuff for people interested in ballistics.
This
-
-
- Updated - - -
-
I read somewhere he was shot in the back and in the neck…that will drop/kill you
Drop, yes. Kill, probably. Kill instantly, maybe not. Officer Pierson was shot in the neck and was still able to pull himself into the police car before he passed away. They only need one second to shoot back.
@neonglh, to your original question… im going to go with ‘no longer with us.’
Have a bad time = 100% chance
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Explain trivia crack to me then.
[quote=“HouseS2K,post:19,topic:271547"”]
I doubt they are skimping on their guns considering all those new fancy cars hahah either way police issue pistols and ammo are more powerful than off the shelf stuff we civilians get, it’s still a couple shots to the torso at close range.
Sent from my iPhone 6
[/quote]
Dude, do some research before stating your opinion as fact. Damn liberals.
How about this don’t label me as something I am not, you don’t even know me. Lol
Sent from my iPhone 6
They hate us cuz they anus.
The only thing I can question is the fact that he was shot in the back while running away. Granted he dropped and picked up a gun and could have turned around and started shooting at anytime.
Sounds like you answered your own question.
I can bowl a strike backwards under my legs, and I’m a horrible bowler.
Imagine what could have happened with this piece of work.
Are you suggesting that this guy could pick up a 7/10 split backwards and under his legs? Damn liberals.
I’m not suggesting it, I’m saying this guy was the next Arnold Palmer of bowling.
Well I do enjoy his lemonade and iced tea mixture.
Answere your own question there
You’re an idiot, and 100% wrong. As a matter of fact, civilians can carry MUCH better equipped firearms than police officers. (don’t know any officers carrying an STi2011 with beveled magwell)
[quote=“HouseS2K,post:19,topic:271547"”]
I doubt they are skimping on their guns considering all those new fancy cars hahah either way police issue pistols and ammo are more powerful than off the shelf stuff we civilians get, it’s still a couple shots to the torso at close range.
Sent from my iPhone 6
[/quote]
-
-
- Updated - - -
-
[quote=“neonglh,post:17,topic:271547"”]
Not true. First, not all police carry .45, many are actually switching back to 9mm for cost savings and follow up shot accuracy. The caliber size is only really important for initial knockdown power though, you still die from blood loss most of the time. One of my friends that is a firearms instructor at Quantico was telling me that even with .223 you still have a good 20 seconds of time before they bleed out, during which time you could be shot back. The time is much greater with handgun calibers.
[/quote]
extremely true. there’s a case where a subject was shot 14 times in the torso with .223 from close distances (<15yds) and he still kept advancing as the rounds were passing right through him leaving narrow wound channels… the 15th shot to the dome stopped him,though.