Q: Are Honda's reliable?

[quote=“sureshot!,post:39,topic:36041"”]

You got me man. It’s incredibly obvious that my civic’s 45mpg is total shit to your TDI’s alleged 55mpg. Apparently you aren’t wise with your money if you aren’t rocking a TDI and getting 50+ mpg.

[/quote]

lol you guys are totally arguing over who has the girlier car. congrats you are both gigantic MO’s.

[quote=“93dx–hatch,post:33,topic:36041"”]

No, there is now way a civic coupe will get better MPGS as a TDI sorry try again. I have seen mid 50s MPG when I had my TDI, I am very accurate with filling my tank. 800+ miles on one tank.

A civic VX on the other hand will be a good competitor for the TDI

[/quote]

the VX stock averages 40-55mpg, and guys have pulled 70+mpg out of them. not sure what was done to them tho.

[quote=“sureshot!,post:39,topic:36041"”]

You got me man. It’s incredibly obvious that my civic’s 45mpg is total shit to your TDI’s alleged 55mpg. Apparently you aren’t wise with your money if you aren’t rocking a TDI and getting 50+ mpg.

[/quote]

it didn’t say it was shit you I just wanted you to agree with badnewsmini when you said :

[quote=“sureshot!,post:39,topic:36041"”]

I have a hard time agreeing with you on this one.

[/quote]

My TDIs 55mpg is proven I have reciepts to prove it just like your alleged 45mpg; I have seen 800+ miles out of my thank a few times, I doesn’t happen all the time, but on long trips where I was not speeding.

Wow I just wasted that much time arguing about MPG :bloated:

[quote=“layzie,post:42,topic:36041"”]

the VX stock averages 40-55mpg, and guys have pulled 70+mpg out of them. not sure what was done to them tho.

[/quote]

Sureshot! has a coupe not a VX

coupes probably wont see much more then 35mpg. The VX had a motor designed for gas mileage. They were faster then DX`s too, oh and had vtec-E, DAN!

vx only had 92hp where the dx had 103hp and higher redline

[quote=“93dx–hatch,post:46,topic:36041"”]

vx only had 92hp where the dx had 103hp and higher redline

[/quote]

correct BUT,

the VX was 2,094lbs compared to the DX 2,178lbs. Having almost a 100 less pounds and being only 10 hp and 1 lb trq less then the dx, 10 hp more wouldn’t make up for the extra 100lbs the dx had on the vx.

track times

VX - 16.5
DX - 16.8

AAAAH SHIT WHATS UP NOW!! lol

someone would buy this and try to hit 1 million miles and it would die at 999,999mi

:shrug:

Assuming a 10MPG difference, and a $.20 price premium for unleaded over disel that is a $20,000 cost in gas alone.

While you may make fun of VWs for being maintenance whores, using my 150,000 A4 as an example, assume the major expenses added up to $5000, versus maybe $1500 over the same period for the VW. That is a $21000 maintenance difference.

Net and net, you’re almost even.

Its hardly “mad cheaper”, sorry Honday boiz.

You must have not seen the price of diesel lately because its about $.30 more than unleaded

Incredible…

if you dont own a honda, you are dumb

/thread.

seriously… look at the cackord. i wonder how long it would last if i actually maintained it…

the cost of owning a vw isnt really that bad…

its bad for those who have to pay for labor, and when things go they usually follow a pattern…

besides, there way more comfortable,

i drove my civic from buffalo to cleveland 210 miles one way, then back on one tank 420 miles to the tank… i.e. 41 mpg…

i also drove my gti from buffalo to toledo ohio a 310 mile one way trip. and around and back… approx 650 miles. filled up 1.5 times, for a mpg of 35 at 75…

if i have to replace 2 more parts a year on the gti then the civic and spend even 1000 more dollars to own a vw i will just because of how comfortable it is…

and dont even get me started on safety =)

hondas are just very reliable bikes but rather with 4 wheels and shift linkage that never stays in one place =)

^ have you driven a NEW honda?

I really don’t think a vw is more comfortable than a honda

[quote=“93dx–hatch,post:46,topic:36041"”]

vx only had 92hp where the dx had 103hp and higher redline

[/quote]

[quote=“layzie,post:47,topic:36041"”]

correct BUT,

the VX was 2,094lbs compared to the DX 2,178lbs. Having almost a 100 less pounds and being only 10 hp and 1 lb trq less then the dx, 10 hp more wouldn’t make up for the extra 100lbs the dx had on the vx.

track times

VX - 16.5
DX - 16.8

AAAAH SHIT WHATS UP NOW!! lol

[/quote]

i have an EX. :slight_smile:

^ oh shit 125hp

[quote=“93dx–hatch,post:54,topic:36041"”]

^ have you driven a NEW honda?

I really don’t think a vw is more comfortable than a honda

[/quote]

Werd… Go get a accord :slight_smile:

Ive been in a new passat, 2 jettas and something that i dont know what it was, and… eh, theyre not that fantastic IMO…

If I were Honda I’d buy this thing, baby it to a million miles, then advertise the shit out of it.

[quote=“93dx–hatch,post:54,topic:36041"”]

^ have you driven a NEW honda?

I really don’t think a vw is more comfortable than a honda

[/quote]

i would highly advise you refrain from arguing with bandwagon idiots.

before you go for the obvious retort, realize i made this post from my windows PC.

yes i have…

you get more for 17,000 in a VW then you ever will in a Honda… period