I was trying to point out that people that are supposedly the most educated and make the most money annually purchase the least reliable brand of luxury car. Rather hilarious.
How are those brands not reliable?
^ Because he doesnt drive any of those. Therefore they are not as good as his brand (prolly Honda).
I was referring to Audi…
Yeah totally man, Honda’s are awesome!
Now a days everything is pretty reliable
How would PureXTC know what he should aspire to be then?
My beer thing went off.
))==D
no no no
))=D
I don’t think I’d be able to charge a live in gf “rent.” It be more along the lines of her taking care of some utilies or “helping” pay the morgage. To call it rent just seems like them being a room mate.
If you think the average person who makes 180+ k per year and buys a new Audi:
A: keeps it once the warranty runs out
Or
B: can’t afford the few thousand in worst case scenario repairs
Then I don’t know what to say…
Or what is even more likely, leases it because they swap cars like Bing switches watches.
the only thing of value in this thread is the concept of beckonomics.
it deserves its own thread for further development
and to facebook it goes
i have a car allowance coming and i’m thinking of upgrading my car to something that will make people think i’m earning in the 1.5 - 2.0 Becks range.
Is it wise to create somewhere between a 1.25 to 1.5 Beck ratio on actual Becks?
Or more specifically, when we consider the concept of units of beck do we have to simultaeneously consider artificially inflating actual units of beck?
Or in other words, if you make 1.1 units of beck you have to create the perception that you earn 1.25 x (1.1 units of beck) and therefore when someone tells you or seems to be earning 1.5 units of beck you can posit that they are actually earning 1.5 / 1.25 units of Beck.
so what car should i get if i make 1.25 units of beck so that i will project an income of 1.25 x 1.25 units of beck?
:highfive:
DUH! Toyota
You’re Canadian…there is no exchange rate for Becks, sorry bro.