more adjustability.
I was the only guy using the turnbuckle style adjustment and i think some people were skeptical why we were still using it when everyone else went with the double adjuster style.
I’ve had the double adjuster hardware for years, individual pieces from various other brands, but we’ve beefed it up a bit. All other brands that i have seen have a thinner wall thickness of the double adjuster, ours should be the thickest… which is good.
probably not to be honest.
The only guys that need that are people that are dumped retardedly low, i don’t want to cater to guys with that mindset. It’s low beyond the point of function.
My cars are low, my S13 has solid subframe bushings, and yet i’ve never even come close to any bent toe arm issue. It’s a gimmicky feature for most people and doesnt add value, just cost.
i am not sure that i will be able to offer such a program. there is certainly nothing wrong with the other arms, i’ve had them on both of my cars for years and today i was at the S1DC shop where Chris has had his Bings RUCA’s for 3+ years including through winters… still holding up strong.
I’m being pretty aggressive keeping these arms at the current price point. They are clearly superior to PBM which at the current exchange rate is much more expensive considering international shipping as well. SPL is using the same rods ends, but with their hybrid adjuster, and mine will come in around $100 more by the time you get them in your hands. This means that my arms still continue to offer serious value.
Anything else you can pretty much throw in the garbage as far as i am concerned.
I have arms kicking around using Aurora rod ends, high misalignment, without a rod end seal and with less than 2 years of work (no winters) they are showing noticeable wear. I havent seen my rod ends show that kind of wear after 3-5 years including winters.