from an international branding, marketing, publicity, labour, manufacturing and cultural importance perpective the textile industry is incredibly similar and in many case more heavily regulated than the automotive industry. Many nations have thier prime exports very closely tied to textiles (raw materials [cotton] and labour) as others do to the automotive industry (raw materials [steel] and labour)
the social importance of each industry gives rise to regulation and the degrees of it.
Dave said this:
companies have done even more dispicable things than that…
for example, Bayer Corp intentionally distributed blood in third world countries known to be infected with HIV.
they did not go bankrupt and that is a far wrse atrocity than the supposed one in this case though i am not supporting dave’s arguement, i am simply opposing your point that it would mean bankruptcy.
Automotive manufacturers are not just automotive manufacturers, their influence is far reaching and in fact they can get away with incredible things that you would think they shouldnt be allowed to get away with.
i have several documentaries about this type of thing that i could show you in fact.
your math is correct, but percentages are by defination relative measures. the decreases mentioned would be relative to previous year stats in the same geographical region, not across international bounderies and over differing populations.
what you are saying is that the absolute number of 1% of cars in the UK is equal to the absolute of .2% of US cars.
that doesnt have any relevance to relative changes per year in automotive theft statistics.
–
i dont necessarily agree with Dave at all here… but i hate the way that some people’s arguements might lead lurkers to think they have a valid point.
since no one beleives me when i thrash against certain people who oppose my informed opinions regarding certain issues perhaps the point will be made when i dont have anything to do with the subject matter