why vote yours means shit if they person you vote for doesn’t win your state…I knew Kerry was winning PA so why bother and waste my hour or 2
You didnt know shit. No one knew who would win PA. Thats why they call it a “swing state” :slap:
hahahaha ignorance!!! please guys, don’t say ‘republicans’ this… because canned comments = teh lose.
- darkstar… as i’m down with you and all the hippie :shaggy: hold hands and be friends shit… you have to know in the real world shit happens and you win or lose. I’m not saying it’s totally right that bush got away clean, i’m saying it’s smart because it was legal… HE didn’t purposly kill the company and jump ship to make profit. He knew that they took a bid for off shore drilling, coulnt’ handle it, dumped too much money into the venture and were about to go under.
out in the ‘real world’ shit happens regardless of fair or nice. undoubtedly. why didn’t bin laden ‘declare war’ against the US and set a battleground as opposed to hijacking planes and flying them into the world trade center… ?
no I knew because everywhere you go there are kerry signs
there is some concrete evidence right there darkstar - no sense arguing that point.
yeah like you knew that buying another DSM was a mistake so you bought a nissan. you’re not a DSM traitor 
you just made a sound choice
that’s true, you’re not living here. i had a feeling it was gonna be a beat down in PA
I know the real world is a harsh place, but this is the way I look at it. as the CEO of that company, he is answerable to the stockholders. He works for the stockholders. President is basically CEO of the USA, and we are the stockholders. He basically fucked over all the stockholders of the company. If he knew the company couldnt handle the off shore contracts, why did he take them? Its just an issue of business ethics. Im sure that there are people in the govt that are way worse than him, and im sure there are things that are way worse about Bush than that. Its the nature of a politician, which doesnt reflect so much on Bush as it does on our political system as a whole.
im not sure I like your analogy. :finger:
:stick: :bowrofl: :grouphug:
:love:
wouldn’t it be great if CEO’s gave a shit about the stockholders? it’s more like the stockholders are suppose to dictate the CEO’s moves… not vice versa.
such is the greed that comes from Capitalism. :hs:
its not a perfect system, but is the best out there by far. It just has some bad side effects.
By the way they call it a swing state because it can “Swing” the way the election is going with it’s electoral votes…it is amazing they let idiots like you vote…you should have to answer questions before they let people like you fuck up our country
I think we should all not ever vote and just put the guy in office who has the prettiest and most signs on the road :rolleyes:
what does that have to do with the definition of a swing state…you are really struggling…you should concede too
they call it a swing state because its a state that is close enough that no one knows who will win it, and it could go either way.
as far as intellegence, when i post :darkstar: nothing happens.
now when i post itr41 with colons on either side… :itr41:
ohhh no someone makes fun of me on the internet…and you are wrong look it up fag
ladies ladies… a swing state is such that
(kerry edwards) - (bush cheney) = ± say 10% (don’t know what the national standard is)
so it’s just saying it’s too close to call but:
If a campaign wins a plurality of the popular vote in a state, the candidate receives all of that state’s electoral votes; no benefit is gained from receiving additional votes above the margin necessary to win
thank you. 