COVID-19/20/21/22 Discussion (NOW COVID-23?)

lol… wow that word came and went didnt it.


I want to run for Canadian office.

1 Like

did you find that in the CBC story i posted?

Masking, jabs, and lockdowns have had such a great affect in the last two years so why not keep doing the same thing?

COVID is like a spinout on an icy road. Once it starts, pucker your ass, hold on, and wait to see how it ends up.

No, counter steer, maintain throttle and look ahead.

1 Like

yes but that is only if you want to actually correct your path. if you want to keep spinning to make your passengers ill so that you can keep printing money to buy gravol to sell them from the driver’s seat then you stay in that spin bruh… forever.

That’s where I posted it.
2 likes so far

And just like that,

The comments were pretty good too. most of the ones I read were Anti JT.
Edit2: That’s my comment. I want to see just how many people agree with very dumb statements.

I guess i cant understand what he’s saying so how do i know if the translation is correct

Big day at the SC today.

1 Like

Some interesting questions being asked, and one giant pile of horseshit from the SC diversity hire Sotomayor.

Barrett asks how long OSHA intends to use emergency powers

Justice Barrett asks the government how long OSHA intends to use the powers it has to bypass the notice-and-comment period of regulation, given that COVID-19 is now on its way to becoming endemic, and may last for years if not longer.
“When must OSHA resort to its normal authority and notice and comment?” she asks.
The government lawyer says that is not clear but assures the court that this is “not a way to bypass notice and comment permanently.”

Kavanaugh quizzes government on lack of explicit congressional approval for OSHA mandate

Kavanaugh, on the arguments that Congress has not authorized OSHA to make these mandates, notes that Congress has made explicit references to vaccines on a number of occasions in statute (but not in this instance), and he notes that President Bush made reference to a potential threat of this nature in 2005.
“Yet there has not been a vaccine statute passed by Congress to deal with this kind of thing,” he said.
The government lawyer says she believes Congress would have anticipated this as vaccines are often the single most effective way to target a virus and to stop its spread.

Alito asks about possible vaccine side-effects

Alito asks Prelogar about the side-effects of vaccines in some instances, while strongly stressing that the vaccines are overwhelmingly safe.
Prelogar says that there are some adverse consequences, but minimal compared to COVID-19.
Alito asks if OSHA has ever imposed any other regulation that would impose potential adverse health effects on workers. Prelogar says it has not, but there is no reason to think the regulation is precluded on that ground.

Roberts references Klain’s ‘workaround’ tweet

Chief Justice Roberts makes reference to a tweet retweeted by White House Chief of Staff Ronald Klain, which described the OSHA mandate as a “workaround.”
“I mean, this has been referred to the approach as a workaround. And I’m wondering what it is you’re trying to work around?” he asks.

And then this verbal diarrhea from Sotomayor…

Sotomayor says Omicron is just as deadly for unvaxxed; Thomas asks about transmission

Ohio Solicitor General Benjamin Flowers, representing the coalition of GOP-led states opposing the OSHA rules, was quizzed by Justice Sotomayor on the mandates – which she again said was not a mandate.

She objected to his claim that Omicron represented a new situation than Delta, given its lesser severity in many instances, as well as his claim that vaccines appeared to be less effective at stopping transmission.

Sotomayor pointed to increased hospitalizations and said that “those numbers show that omicron is just as deadly for the unvaccinated.”

“We have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in serious condition and many on ventilators,” she said.

Justice Thomas, meanwhile, asks Flowers to speak more about the different risks and the vaccine’s effectiveness at stopping transmission.

He cites data saying vaccinated over 65s are twice as likely to die as 18-49 who are unvaccinated.

Sotomayor fires back and accuses him of “comparing apples to oranges” and says “lower risk is not no risk.” She also says that the unvaccinated put other people at risk.

I see our supreme court judge somehow is a well versed doctor or medical expert now. Interesting.

1 Like

the government owns your body. you will inject what you are told to inject without regard for your individual circumstances.

coming to you boys shortly.


Only in places with “universal free healthcare”. So keep an eye on Massachusetts first.

In other news, what’s worse here? That she “quarantined” her kid in the trunk of a car? Or that she’s a teacher:

chicken and the egg me thinks

im sure we already have a few posts about this but since it continues to happen i thought i would put another post up from last month

another dude today

video of Coulibaly here:

I assumed these instances were common knowledge but after speaking with people i’m fairly close with even persons who follow sports pretty religously, though not necessarily EU soccer, were not aware in the slightest

just the fact that i can listen to this whole thing unedited a couple days after it happened is why i love your system even if there are challenges created by it.

incredible.

wish there was video with names so i could google these lawyers. The way they handle these questions from the judges so quickly and in such a specific way demonstrates remarkable mental acuity.

https://yournews.com/2022/01/08/2278667/triple-vaccinated-swiss-olympic-athlete-fabienne-schlumpf-diagnosed-with-myocarditis/

And