[quote=“JayS,post:5040,topic:25170"”]
http://www.allthingshockey.com/News2.html
Pretty good article. Sums up this town and this team well.
[/quote]
that is the Worst web page i have ever seen… I refuse to read, cause it just flat out sucks at life
edit: HAHAHA no wonder why <meta name=“generator” content=“Yahoo! SiteBuilder/2.3/1.5.0_02”>
[quote=“Pass McGrass,post:5038,topic:25170"”]
[/quote]
haha… you even look gay when you scream.
^^ LOL
hes like “oooooooooooo this callahan guy is cuuuuuuuuuuuuute”
[quote=“RobHimself,post:5032,topic:25170"”]
We all know it was a goal but it cannot be called a goal because there wasn’t evidence to overturn the no goal ruling on the ice. Its a bummer but why the hell are the sabres not putting more in the net anyway, that is the real question. The rangers played better hockey last night plain and simple. Come friday they had better get their shit together or else there will be problems.
[/quote]
x2, we have been outplayed in 100 of the last 120 mins of regulation hockey.
There is no reason why we have to wait until the 3rd period to score a goal.
The only hope I have is that they start fridays game like they ended tuesdays game. Otherwise we’re screwed.
Max will be playing in game 5 too
and
► 05.01.2007: As per WGR-AM, barring any setbacks, Paul Gaustad WILL play Friday night in Game 5.
good. Get some forechecking and some pressure. Zubrus and Goose for the win!
[quote=“Pass McGrass,post:5031,topic:25170"”]
Kinda like how Miller had the puck underneath him in the Islanders series and it was called no goal? Kinda like that? Because any idiot could tell you that it was underneath him when he was across the line. But since you couldn’t physically SEE the puck over the line, it wasn’t a goal.
[/quote]
That play was ruled no goal because Miller got steamrolled into the net with the puck under him.
Good try though.
[quote=“SI01,post:5048,topic:25170"”]
That play was ruled no goal because Miller got steamrolled into the net with the puck under him.
Good try though.
[/quote]
Haha. No. The WHISTLE blew because the ref lost site of the puck. Then Miller was steamrolled into the net with the puck under him. The play was still reviewed and there was no evidence that the puck crossed the line until Miller was pushed in.
Nice try though?
http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=376190
If you’re still crying about how the goal last night should’ve counted, click that link and add your 2 super valuable cents. I’m sure everyone on that Sabres-biased forum would love to hear what you have to say about it :roll2:
I don’t see why they couldn’t put a sensor inside the puck so they could actually track where the puck is. I don’t think it would add a great cost to the game. Sure it may bite the sabres in the ass sometimes but at least it would be accurate.
[quote=“Pass McGrass,post:5049,topic:25170"”]
Haha. No. The WHISTLE blew because the ref lost site of the puck. Then Miller was steamrolled into the net with the puck under him. The play was still reviewed and there was no evidence that the puck crossed the line until Miller was pushed in.
Nice try though?
http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=376190
If you’re still crying about how the goal last night should’ve counted, click that link and add your 2 super valuable cents. I’m sure everyone on that Sabres-biased forum would love to hear what you have to say about it :roll2:
[/quote]
Regardless, a goalie getting steamrolled (which wouldn’t have counted with a whistle or no) and a case of a puck crossing or not crossing the goal line are two different things.
If you disagree with that, you’d just be trolling the thread.
Oh…wait…
[quote=“SI01,post:5051,topic:25170"”]
Regardless, a goalie getting steamrolled (which wouldn’t have counted with a whistle or no) and a case of a puck crossing or not crossing the goal line are two different things.
[/quote]
You said that the goal did not count because Miller was plowed into the net. The goal was not allowed because the the ref lost sight of the puck and blew the whistle. Anything that happens after that is moot. Wtf are you talking about?
[quote=“Pass McGrass,post:5052,topic:25170"”]
The goal was not allowed because the the ref lost sight of the puck and blew the whistle. Anything that happens after that is moot.
[/quote]
[quote=“Pass McGrass,post:5031,topic:25170"”]
Kinda like how Miller had the puck underneath him in the Islanders series and it was called no goal? Kinda like that? Because any idiot could tell you that it was underneath him when he was across the line. But since you couldn’t physically SEE the puck over the line, it wasn’t a goal.
[/quote]
Pass McGrass #1: No goal because the whistle blew.
Pass McGrass #2: No goal because you couldn’t see the puck in the net?
WTF are you talking about?
Take your 2 quotes and add this one before it
[quote=“90NA300ZX,post:5010,topic:25170"”]
Just because you can not physically see the puck itself in NO WAY means it’s inconclusive…if the puck is under the pad, and the pad is over the line, one can easily conclude that the puck is across the line as well…but since you can’t see the puck itself, no goal…fucking stupid call…
[/quote]
Kinda like how Miller had the puck underneath him in the Islanders series and it was called no goal? Kinda like that? Because any idiot could tell you that it was underneath him when he was across the line. But since you couldn’t physically SEE the puck over the line, it wasn’t a goal.
The ruling on the ice was no goal BECAUSE THE WHISTLE BLEW. However, the play was still reviewed. So if the replay judges could have proved that the puck crossed the line before the whistle, it would have counted. Now here is where you read 90NA300zx’s comment again. Now you can add this:
[quote=“SI01,post:5053,topic:25170"”]
Pass McGrass #2: No goal because you couldn’t see the puck in the net
[/quote]
:bloated:
[quote=“Pass McGrass,post:5054,topic:25170"”]
So if the replay judges could have proved that the puck crossed the line before the whistle, it would have counted.
[/quote]
Sure, unless an Islander had shoved Miller into the net (which is what happened). Because, and I hope this isn’t a newsflash, you can’t do that:snky:
I’m done with you now anyway, for two reasons: 1. I don’t enjoy feeding trolls, and 2. I don’t feel like earning a j espo like ban.
[quote=“SI01,post:5055,topic:25170"”]
Sure, unless an Islander had shoved Miller into the net (which is what happened). Because, and I hope this isn’t a newsflash, you can’t do that:snky:
I’m done with you now anyway, for two reasons: 1. I don’t enjoy feeding trolls, and 2. I don’t feel like earning a j espo like ban.
[/quote]
lol
Ohhhhh ssssssssssNAP! You showed me.
lol, you guys need to relax. it is what it is.
and we all know that the rangers are gonna take the series.
[quote=“LAFENGAS,post:5042,topic:25170"”]
haha… you even look gay when you scream.
[/quote]
lol…
thats almost as bad as my pic on TV was 
enough about the goal who cares it only would have taken us into OT its not like it would have won the game for us