reptiles to birds. do you want to argue that? fish to land mammals. try that one.
wow siamese twins is call you can come up with. you sir are a fucking joke. and what do you do in medicine that you have seen a lot weirder stuff. hmm?
who said anything about arguing sources and excerpts from the bible i was arguing proof that the remains found were not genetic defects as they are today.
you dont’ even know what i do so there’s no sence in being all sarcastic calling me out on my job which btw is fujifilm medical we process and store digital imaging mainly CR but our PACS system obv supports all modalities (look it up) i’ve seen patients (mostly babies) develop without spines, without legs, with small heads, with half of their brain, normal porptioned arms/legs with tiny torsos, normal upper bodies with small legs (gee they must walk on all 4’s then) no eye sockets, half a skull, no joints in extremeties
but the fuckijng joke comment made this a pissing match there’s no point in responding anymore /out
wow pictures? that all you ve seen? ive seen it with my own eyes in the hospital.
So did god create Neanderthals also?
That seems like it would be at odds with the Bible’s idea that man was created in ‘god’s image’. Are we to believe that he created a kind of man before Homo sapiens that co-existed, but was obviously not in his image, having no shared DNA with H. sapiens, who are created in his image? Neanderthal man (who we have skeletal evidence of more than 400 examples), lived alongside H. sapiens, had a slightly larger brain, the ability to vocalise (and, presumably, communicate), and had mastery of fire and machinery (hatchets, hammers, etc…)
Neanderthal man and H. sapiens have a common ancestor in either Homo ergaster (a subspecies of H. erectus) or H. erectus itself.
I’m not saying we can soundly prove any kind of direct link to apes, but it’s obvious we weren’t the only men to walk this Earth, and our ancestry can be traced back all the way to Homo habilis.
Truthfully, I feel like that alot.
I also kind of disagree with the 10% of the brain. I think that’s one of those statistics that through quoting has gotten turned around. I actually think that it’s we use only 10% at a given time. Each portion of the brain does have a function, but there’s a lot of the brain we are just starting to understand.
i’m sorry you misunderstood what i wrote but i believe i said i’ve seen patients not pictures of patients…the imaging thing was telling you what i did
and wit imaging for fuji and then saying seen patients. you tend to think you see them on paper.
how can you guys sit here and argue about this? :gives:
nothing was ever on paper…by imaging i mean computed radiography, CT, MRI and other forms of diagnostic imaging not pictures in someones scrap book
:ugh:
On-Topic… GTFO ----->