i wasnt trying to defend imported products…
what i am saying is that people over estimate the costs involved.
toyota and Honda do millions of dollars in testing because they are HUGE companies and bare HUGE liability.
if your URAS or UEO STYLE or KAZAMA or evne D2 suspension components, or whatever products of theirs you use, break on you there is virtually no warranty anyways.
beyond that there is no way to seek legal restitution from such small companies based in other parts of the world
as a result they dont have to do testing on the same level and they dont.
I’ll bet you that testing of new products can be based on testing of old products that will absolve companies in the case of a legal battle.
by that i mean that if some one files a lawsuit against TEIN for neglegence because one of their coilovers was defective causing injury that TEIN could fall on industry testing, ISO documentation or testing conducted on other models of their coilovers (perhaps even discontinued) to beat any sort of case.
as a result they would not have to do all the wonderful things that people assume that they do in the course of R&D. however i am just using TEIN as an example. i am sure their R&D is far more extensive to most comapnies considering the size and scope of their operation.
the point of this thread was to discuss the companies that are attaching their names to generic gear and launching companies right as the scene gets big.
or in other words; reaches the maturity stage of the product life cycle
the discussion was meant to find out how people make their decisions and if they trust these newer companies.
i can assure you that some of the companies coming out with products this year (Stance, Tarmac, etc. etc.) are NOT doing the testing that Tein would have to do and i say this because these new companies are NOT making the products.
as mentioned i work for a private label food processing firm and we produce goods for the biggest names in the grocery industry.
if there is a problem and someone gets sick eating our products the liability ultimately comes back to us, not Maple Lodge or Presidents Choice. They stand to lose as far as reputation and credibility, but we are the manufacturer and our HACCP program would come under scrutiny.
because most of the companies today DO NOT MAKE their own gear you dont have that kind of legal recourse to attack them based on lack of testing or product quality because they dont make the products.
fukk, ranting…
that is one of the primary reasons for outsouring the manufacturing of goods like these.
you remove the requirement for a producitn workforce and all thehardships that go with it and you also absolve yourself from a great deal of liability.
the motivation to do all the testing is gone