Fake but damn I laughed.
So the recent events show this… Any Bernie supporter still out there who is thinking of voting for Hillary or still supporting Bernie is nothing but a shallow idiot. This guy who was supposed to be all about political revolution and money out of politics, anti-corruption candidate endorsed Hillary to the full extent, thw candidate that factually stands for corruption. Even after it was shown for a fact that the whole process was rigged against him from the getgo. If you can repeat that back to me and still support him or her, there is just no point in even taking your opinion with a grain of salt because you show that you do not care for anything resembling truth and justice, just a fraud like Bernie and Hillary. I respect the Bernie supporters who are now saying they will vote green party etc.
But hey, the question is, who hacked those emails? The content doesn’t matter. Nobody is disputing the content.
Feel the Johnson… He’s got my vote.
I’m guessing that he has been talked to about a possible cabinet position so it wouldn’t make sense to continue as her opposition. Why burn the bridge when you can still position yourself to have an influence in the white house?
Because that clearly shows that that he’s a sell-out and a fraud. It would work in somebody else’s case but not at Bernie’s. How could you even begin to think that you could make so-called influence In an Administration that defeated you by rigging the system? When your whole platform and this so-called Bernie movement is all about taking corruption out of government done the right thing to do would have been to walk away and make a stand for what you have been preaching. This just shows that there was something to gain from personally . Let’s remember that he ran on the idea that there needs to be a political revolution and people supported him for it. People thought that their vote mattered people actually spent their savings for that movement to go ahead and have anything to do with the system that betrays you for some far-off notion that you could have an influence is just nonsense and you don’t do that if you stand for anything real. You don’t change the system in that way. If you want to tear down the system where money is what makes things happen you cannot have anything to do with Administration of the woman who is not in prison simply because of her connections and being filthy rich. I think we all understand that if it was any of us regular citizens in her spot we would have been sent to prison a long time ago.
Whether they care to admit it or not Bernie supporters got stabbed in the back
Copied and pasted…
MONEY LAUNDERING AT IT’S FINEST.
Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton
Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt …
some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private
e-mail server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
The Clinton Foundation is “organized crime” at its finest.
Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme.
It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. History.
This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes.
All tax free.
Here’s how it works:
- You create a separate foreign “charity.”
In this case, the Clintons set it up in Canada . - Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this
Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did –
contributing mega millions.
I’m sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts,
and expected nothing in return.
(Imagine Putin’s buddies waking up one morning and just
deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity). - The Canadian charity then bundles these separate
donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton
Foundation. - The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian
charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of
individual donors. - The Clinton Foundation then “spends” some of this money
for legitimate good works programs.
Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%.
Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clintons, pay
salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish
travel, etc. Again, virtually tax free, which means you and I
are subsidizing it. - The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world’s best
accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their
tax filings. They discover these “clerical errors” and begin
the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns. - Net result – foreign money goes into the Clintons’s
pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original
donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.
Oh, by the way, the Canadian “charity” includes as a
principal one Frank Giustra. Google him.
He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium
One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired
massive U.S. Uranium interests and then sold them to an
organization controlled by Russia. This transaction
required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who
was Secretary of State when the approval was granted.
As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob
Mc Donnell feels.
That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company.
Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. Security at risk.
Sarcasm aside, if you’re still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clintons, ask yourself this: Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity?
Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation?
Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need?
This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
Now you know why Hillary’s destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.
Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal and they are Slick!
I voted Johnson last election cycle and I may end up voting Johnson again as the New York vote for anything non-Hillary is a throwaway anyway, so I might as well participate in trying to get enough of the popular to go libertarian to get that party involved in the next debate cycle. That said, I hate Hillary more than Trump and I pay a fucking stupid amount of taxes, so I’ll roll the dice on Trump as needed.
+1… Assuming Hillary doesn’t continue imploding in the polls with scandal after scandal and NY isn’t in play by the time November rolls around. Of course if it’s gotten so bad for her that NY is actually in play the election will be a landslide for Trump in the rest of the country.
Anyone catch Cuomo bragging about how NY is the “progressive bellwether for the nation” at the DNC last night? No shit asshole, that’s why we’re by far the highest taxed state in the country with public sector unions and un-elected authorities completely out of touch and out of control. No one in their right mind would look at the business and tax climate and NY and brag about it.
NY is ranked dead last in business friendliness.
Yeah, but we’re #1 in a lot of things
#1 in overall tax burden
#1 in property taxes
#1 in medicaid spending (not just per-capita, but overall. Despite being much smaller than CA and TX)
#1 in corruption (no other state has seen as many elected officials forced out over ethics or criminal issues).
But yeah, we’re the blazing beacon of progressive nirvana.
I was shocked at the difference in property taxes from NY to even California which is supposed to be the bluest of blue states. Taxes on a house assessed over $700k are comparable to a $250k house in Williamsville. You pay a flat 1% rate and your assessment can never go up more than 2% a year. Keeps things much more manageable. Then again, I imagine the higher assessed values there make up for it.
I forced myself to watch the DNC until I just couldn’t do it anymore. Bernie supporters crying, women throwing their arms up in disbelief that Hilldog won the nomination and it’s all about the 1st woman to be nominated. Give me a break man! This all feels forced, being shoved down our throats as some big great accomplishment. I’m all for a woman to claim presidency, just not anyone of the Clinton’s.
I also really find it hard to believe, that right off the bat, the DNC had 3M more viewers than the RNC, just another media stat to make it seem real.
UGH, I could go on for hours, but it really doesn’t do anything at this point…
And the whole time Blowjob Bill was talking, I just wanted to him to say ‘Blowjobs are better than no jobs’, drop the mic and walk away. I mean, what else does he really have to say anyways?
I would bet my paycheck that the crowd cheering noises were pumped in. It sounded like 80,000 or 100,000 people cheering.
You think this election is bad? Wait until the next one. By then the media will have a stronger hold on public opinion, the country will be more politically torn and you’ll have the next generation of mouth breathers ready to vote.
All they have to do is put rare pokemon in the polling places.
Fixed.
:bigtup:
