Well you made a handful of posts that were only in defense for the rider and claimed it was unconstitutional, so you atleast wanted a little bit of pee flowing. I’m guessing you didn’t actually read the article. The cops studied the video, the cops identified the group…the cops identified the public roads. I’m not sure which part of that isn’t so “solid” to you. If you’re going to say “They didn’t show his face in the video…they can’t prove it was him.” Well police bust criminals every minute of everyday without video evidence. The fact that they HAVE the video as evidence with his bike/helmet/clothes/body that fits his discription…makes it clearly solid.