Much more to do, all within walking (stumbling) distance
I really don’t mind either way. The higher cost for rooms in the city can be offset by putting more people in them (like Carlisle) so that’s what I’ve chosen. And the city has some PIMP hotels.
Well both have their merits, and being in the city would make night time more fun as we wouldn’t need someone to DD everyone around. And a 30 minute drive isn’t bad at all. However I think I screwed my vote up and accidentally clicked outside, when I meant to click inside as I obviously suck at life, and can’t fix it.
Should be good as long as I can get similar arrangements by sharing a room like at Carlisle. With how things are going though I’m not sure if I’ll have the Shadow ready with enough of a cushion “in case shit” fund as it still needs a good deal of work.
outside the city. find a hotel/motel to absolutely take over by the group going from here. i think that would be a better time. no drinking and driving for those that drink, less costs and more fun which i think everyone can agree with.
Outside the city cheaper is a + but, most important to me will be parking lot security ether way. I don’t want to have all our cars in a busy parking lot, dings and prying eyes.
I didn’t need to go out when we were in toronto to get drunk…i was already wasted before we left for the bars. I think the power hour of 11+ shots is what did it.
So either way, i don’t care. I’ll probably just go bowling somewhere anyway.